bye bye to the burn

uncategorized

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 21-point gap between the two loudest voices.

77Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependent

98Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent

050100

See why, ingredient by ingredient

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

21 pts apart

Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

Also screened, nothing found: US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · ANSES Endocrine Disruptors · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · California Proposition 65 · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · IARC Monographs

Environmental

Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

Coverage & match quality

3 ratings · 1 of 4 axes

Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

Weighted by what you care about

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

Ingredient safety1.0×

Environmentalno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

Laborno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

Packagingno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

Ingredients, decoded

Data availability

Robust18 of 18 characterized

Our sources have reference data on all 18 listed ingredients.

Worth a look (4)

Phenoxyethanolpreservative · antimicrobialraters disagree
Mild sensitizer for someflagged by 1 of 9 lists →
Mentha Viridis Leaf Oilfragrance · astringent · skin conditioningraters disagree
EU-regulated fragrance allergenflagged by 1 of 9 lists →
Yellow 5cosmetic colorantraters disagree
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists →
Blue 1cosmetic colorantraters disagree
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

No flags in our sources (14)

What these ingredient tags mean (1)

These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

humectantGlycerin
- Glycerin: A humectant, and one of the two ingredients a comparison of moisturiser components found made a significant difference to skin hydration. FDA OTC skin protectant monograph, 21 CFR 347.10(h), lists glycerin as a skin protectant at 20 to 45%. On the humectant half: Jeong CB, Han JY, Cho JC, Suh KD, Nam GW, "Analysis of electrical property changes of skin by oil-in-water emulsion components", Int J Cosmet Sci 2013;35(4):402-410, DOI 10.1111/ics.12059, PMID 23621673, found that "glycerine and urea showed significant skin hydration effects compared with other humectants".

B-Fresh

bye bye to the burn

uncategorized

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 21-point gap between the two loudest voices.

77Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependent

98Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent

050100

See why, ingredient by ingredient

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

21 pts apart

Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

Environmental

Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

Coverage & match quality

3 ratings · 1 of 4 axes

Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

Weighted by what you care about

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

Ingredient safety1.0×

Environmentalno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

Laborno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

Packagingno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

Ingredients, decoded

Data availability

Robust18 of 18 characterized

Our sources have reference data on all 18 listed ingredients.

Worth a look (4)

Phenoxyethanolpreservative · antimicrobialraters disagree
Mild sensitizer for someflagged by 1 of 9 lists →
Mentha Viridis Leaf Oilfragrance · astringent · skin conditioningraters disagree
EU-regulated fragrance allergenflagged by 1 of 9 lists →
Yellow 5cosmetic colorantraters disagree
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists →
Blue 1cosmetic colorantraters disagree
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

No flags in our sources (14)

What these ingredient tags mean (1)

These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

humectantGlycerin
- Glycerin: A humectant, and one of the two ingredients a comparison of moisturiser components found made a significant difference to skin hydration. FDA OTC skin protectant monograph, 21 CFR 347.10(h), lists glycerin as a skin protectant at 20 to 45%. On the humectant half: Jeong CB, Han JY, Cho JC, Suh KD, Nam GW, "Analysis of electrical property changes of skin by oil-in-water emulsion components", Int J Cosmet Sci 2013;35(4):402-410, DOI 10.1111/ics.12059, PMID 23621673, found that "glycerine and urea showed significant skin hydration effects compared with other humectants".