Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Clinique/Blushing Powder Blush, No. 110 Precious Posy
Blushing Powder Blush, No. 110 Precious Posy
Clinique

Blushing Powder Blush, No. 110 Precious Posy

Blush0.21oz
maracuja juicy blush & bronzer multi-stick

Cleaner pick · Safest face we have rated

Tarte

maracuja juicy blush & bronzer multi-stick

+76 on ingredient safety

$38

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 18111 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. We may earn a commission on the link; it never changes the order.

Your composite

44OUT OF 100Poor

range 36–66

24▲▼ split
Safety
78
Eco
30
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

90-point split

0

Scan

90

Precautionary

0

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

18111 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 90-point gap between the two loudest voices.

0Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependent
vs
90Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 18111 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

90 pts apart
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens

Environmental

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

Labor

  • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

Coverage & match quality

8 ratings · 3 of 4 axes

  • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
  • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

Weighted by what you care about

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

+
1.0×
1.0×
1.0×
Packagingno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

Ingredients, decoded

Data availability

Robust·28 of 28 characterized

Our sources have reference data on all 28 listed ingredients.

Worth a look (13)

  • Titanium Dioxide8/10uv filter · uv absorber · colorantraters disagree

    ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

  • Red 22 Lake8/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

    EU-prohibited · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • Red 36 Lake8/10raters disagree

    EU-prohibited · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • Red 30 Lake8/10raters disagree

    EU-prohibited · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • Red 34 Lake8/10raters disagree

    EU-prohibited · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • Talc6/10abrasive · absorbent · anticakingraters disagree

    IARC probable carcinogen (Group 2A) · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

  • Nylon-124/10opacifying · bulking · viscosity controllingraters disagree

    EU microplastics-restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • Yellow 5 Lake4/10cosmetic colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • Red 7 Lake4/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • Blue 1 Lake4/10cosmetic colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • Red 33 Lake4/10raters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • Red 28 Lake4/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • Red 64/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

✓No flags in our sources (15)

  • Dimethicone
  • Silica
  • Zinc Stearate
  • Lauryl Laurate
  • Tetrasodium EDTA
  • Potassium Sorbate
  • Chlorphenesin
  • May Contain: Mica
  • Iron Oxides
  • Bismuth Oxychloride
  • Carmine
  • Ferric Ferrocyanide
  • Manganese Violet
  • Ultramarines
  • Yellow 6 Lake

Where this came from

Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfreekitty.com ↗

Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.