Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyOpen data via Open Beauty Facts · no EWG/Yuka scraping
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Natasha Denona/Super Glow Highlighter, Bronze
Super Glow Highlighter, Bronze
Natasha Denona

Super Glow Highlighter, Bronze

Bronzer Highlighter

Natasha Denona

Super Glow Highlighter, Bronze

Bronzer Highlighter

hover a pillar to set the scene →

Your composite

89OUT OF 100Excellent

Ingredient safety only

range 80–98

—
Eco
—
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

18-point split

80

Scan

98

Precautionary

88

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

337 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Cleaner options

See 337 cleaner alternatives

Same category, all safer. We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

See better →

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

raters agree
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: California Proposition 65 · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · IARC Monographs · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · ANSES Endocrine Disruptors

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Coverage & match quality

    3 ratings · 1 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Laborno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·20 of 21 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 20 of 21 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Worth a look (3)

    • PHENOXYETHANOL4/10preservative · antimicrobialraters disagree

      Mild sensitizer for some · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    • CI 158504/10colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • CI 191404/10colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    ✓No flags in our sources (17)

    • MICA
    • DIMETHICONE
    • POLYMETHYLSILSESQUIOXANE
    • POLYSORBATE 20
    • ZINC STEARATE
    • DIISOSTEARYL MALATE
    • CAPRYLYL GLYCOL
    • HEXYLENE GLYCOL
    • SODIUM DEHYDROACETATE
    • POTASSIUM SORBATE
    • RICINUS COMMUNIS SEED OIL
    • SODIUM HYALURONATE
    • TIN OXIDE
    • HYDROGENATED CASTOR OIL
    • CI 77491
    • CI 77492
    • CI 77499

    No data in our sources (1)

    • ALUMINUM HYDROXIDE +/-: CI 77891

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.