Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyOpen data via Open Beauty Facts · no EWG/Yuka scraping
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Too Faced/Natural Eyes, (Heaven, Cashmere Bunny) (2018 formulation)
Natural Eyes, (Heaven, Cashmere Bunny) (2018 formulation)
Too Faced

Natural Eyes, (Heaven, Cashmere Bunny) (2018 formulation)

Eye Shadow

Too Faced

Natural Eyes, (Heaven, Cashmere Bunny) (2018 formulation)

Eye Shadow

hover a pillar to set the scene →

Your composite

54OUT OF 100Poor

Ingredient safety only

range 42–90

—
Eco
—
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

46-point split

59

Scan

42

Precautionary

88

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

2833 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 48-point gap between the two loudest voices.

42Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
vs
90EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)Government
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

Cleaner options

See 2833 cleaner alternatives

Same category, all safer. We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

See better →

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

48 pts apart

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: ECHA SVHC Candidate List · California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Coverage & match quality

    7 ratings · 1 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Laborno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·28 of 29 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 28 of 29 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Worth a look (7)

    • Titanium Dioxide8/10uv filter · uv absorber · colorantraters disagree

      ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

    • Talc6/10abrasive · absorbent · anticakingraters disagree

      IARC probable carcinogen (Group 2A) · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

    • Benzyl Alcohol6/10preservative · perfuming · solventraters disagree

      EU harmonised skin sensitizer · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • Coumarin6/10perfumingraters disagree

      ANSES endocrine candidate · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • Fragrance/Parfum6/10perfumingraters disagree

      Undisclosed fragrance blend · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • Phenoxyethanol4/10preservative · antimicrobialraters disagree

      Mild sensitizer for some · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    • Vanillin4/10fragranceraters disagree

      EU-regulated fragrance allergen · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    ✓No flags in our sources (21)

    • Mica
    • Ethylene/Acrylic Acid Copolymer
    • Dimethicone
    • Oryza Sativa Extract/Oryza Sativa Extract
    • Zinc Stearate
    • Sodium Saccharin
    • Aluminum Dimyristate
    • Cocos Nucifera Oil/Cocos Nucifera Oil
    • Disodium Stearoyl Glutamate
    • Hydrogenated Coconut Oil
    • Lauroyl Lysine
    • Methicone
    • Poloxamer 338
    • Silica
    • Sodium Dehydroacetate
    • Sorbic Acid
    • Tocopherol
    • Triethoxycaprylylsilane
    • Ultramarines
    • Iron Oxides
    • Manganese Violet

    No data in our sources (1)

    • MAY CONTAIN/PEUT CONTENIR : Yellow 5 Lake

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

    Where this came from

    Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfree.peta.org ↗

    Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.