Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/bareMinerals/Gen Nude Blonzer Blush + Bronzer, Kiss of Pink
Gen Nude Blonzer Blush + Bronzer, Kiss of Pink
bareMinerals

Gen Nude Blonzer Blush + Bronzer, Kiss of Pink

Blushtypically $30–70
maracuja juicy blush & bronzer multi-stick

Cleaner pick · Safest face we have rated

Tarte

maracuja juicy blush & bronzer multi-stick

+14 on ingredient safety, gives up 18 on labor practices

$38

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 1579 cleaner options →9 in this price band or under

Ranked by safety only. We may earn a commission on the link; it never changes the order.

Your composite

89OUT OF 100Excellent

range 86–96

86▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
92
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

10-point split

90

Scan

100

Precautionary

94

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

1579 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 20-point gap between the two loudest voices.

80ANSES Endocrine DisruptorsGovernment
vs
100Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 1579 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

20 pts apart
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: California Proposition 65 · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · IARC Monographs · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Labor

    • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

    Coverage & match quality

    5 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·23 of 24 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 23 of 24 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Worth a look (2)

    • CAFFEINE6/10perfuming · skin conditioningraters disagree

      ANSES endocrine candidate · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    • RED 7 LAKE4/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    ✓No flags in our sources (21)

    • MICA
    • CAPRYLIC/CAPRIC TRIGLYCERIDE
    • BIS-DIGLYCERYL POLYACYLADIPATE-2
    • DIISOSTEARYL MALATE
    • MICROCRYSTALLINE CELLULOSE
    • PHENYL TRIMETHICONE
    • DIMETHICONE
    • CUCUMIS SATIVUS FRUIT EXTRACT
    • BORAGO OFFICINALIS SEED OIL
    • BORON NITRIDE
    • SILICA
    • DIMETHICONE/VINYL DIMETHICONE CROSSPOLYMER
    • ETHYLHEXYLGLYCERIN
    • CAPRYLYL GLYCOL
    • CALCIUM ALUMINUM BOROSILICATE
    • TIN OXIDE
    • CALCIUM SODIUM BOROSILICATE
    • SYNTHETIC FLUORPHLOGOPITE
    • SODIUM DEHYDROACETATE
    • IRON OXIDES
    • MANGANESE VIOLET

    No data in our sources (1)

    • MAY CONTAIN/PEUT CONTENIR : TITANIUM DIOXIDE

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

    Where this came from

    Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfree.peta.org ↗

    Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.