Too Faced
Kissing Juicy Tint Lip Balm, Sour Watermelon
Lip Balm
hover a pillar to set the scene →
Raters split
Ingredient safety
A 48-point gap between the two loudest voices.
42Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
vs90EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)Government
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredientCleaner options
See 1380 cleaner alternatives
Same category, all safer. We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.
Every rater, every axis
Ingredient safety
48 pts apartA government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Also screened, nothing found: US NTP Report on Carcinogens · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · California Proposition 65
Environmental
Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction
Labor
33 pts apartRun by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Coverage & match quality
8 ratings · 2 of 4 axes
- Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
- Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.
Weighted by what you care about
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+
1.0×
Environmentalno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
1.0×
Packagingno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.
Ingredients, decoded
Data availability
Robust29 of 30 characterized
Our sources have reference data on 29 of 30 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.
Worth a look (5)
ANSES CMR-listedflagged by 5 of 9 lists
Undisclosed fragrance blendflagged by 2 of 9 lists
EU harmonised skin sensitizerflagged by 2 of 9 lists
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists
No flags in our sources (24)
- Octyldodecanol
- Dipentaerythrityl Pentaisostearate
- Caprylic/Capric Triglyceride
- Glycolipids
- Hydrogenated Coco-Glycerides
- Cetyl Ethylhexanoate
- Phytosteryl/Octyldodecyl Lauroyl Glutamate
- Diisostearoyl Polyglyceryl-3 Dimer Dilinoleate
- Synthetic Wax
- Isotridecyl Isononanoate
- Ethylene/ Propylene Copolymer
- Hydrogenated Microcrystalline Wax
- Tocopherol
- Polyglyceryl-3 Polyricinoleate
- Ethylhexyl Palmitate
- Stearalkonium Hectorite
- Dicalcium Phosphate
- Lecithin
- Polyhydroxystearic Acid
- Propylene Carbonate
- Isopropyl Myristate
- Isostearic Acid
- Pentaerythrityl Tetra-Di-T-Butyl Hydroxyhydrocinnamate
- Yellow 6 Lake
No data in our sources (1)
Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.
Where this came from
Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfree.peta.org ↗
Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.