Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Huda Beauty US/GloWish Cheeky Vegan Blush Powder, 04 Charming Cherry
GloWish Cheeky Vegan Blush Powder, 04 Charming Cherry
Huda Beauty US

GloWish Cheeky Vegan Blush Powder, 04 Charming Cherry

Blushtypically $12–30
maracuja juicy blush & bronzer multi-stick

Cleaner pick · Safest face we have rated

Tarte

maracuja juicy blush & bronzer multi-stick

+28 on ingredient safety

$38

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 8089 cleaner options →6 in this price band or under

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

72OUT OF 100Good

Ingredient safety only

range 65–95

72▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
—
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

28-point split

67

Scan

95

Precautionary

82

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

8089 found

See better →

Flagged

5 ingredients

What's flagged →

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 30-point gap between the two loudest voices.

65ANSES Endocrine DisruptorsGovernment
vs
95Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 8089 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

30 pts apart
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · California Proposition 65 · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Coverage & match quality

    6 ratings · 1 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Laborno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·35 of 38 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 35 of 38 listed ingredients; 3 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Worth a look (5)

    • titanium dioxide / ci 778918/10raters disagree

      ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists →

    • rosa damascena flower oil4/10fragrance materialfragrance · skin conditioningraters disagree

      EU-regulated fragrance allergen · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    • citric acid4/10fragrance · chelating · bufferingraters disagree

      Health Canada Hotlist — restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    • yellow 5 lake / ci 191404/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • blue 1 lake / ci 420904/10cosmetic colorant · hair dyeing · colorantraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    ✓No flags in our sources (30)

    • mica
    • silica
    • zinc stearate
    • cetearyl ethylhexanoate
    • dimethiconerich occlusive
    • dodecanefragrance material
    • capsicum annuum extract
    • butyrospermum parkii butter
    • helianthus annuus seed oil
    • ethylhexylglycerin
    • tocopherol
    • glycerinhumectant
    • squalene
    • caprylic/capric triglyceride
    • c30-45 alkyl dimethicone
    • phenylisopropyl dimethicone
    • dimethiconol
    • diethylhexyl syringylidenemalonate
    • triethylhexanoin
    • cetyl peg/ppg-10/1 dimethicone
    • sucrose acetate isobutyrate
    • sorbitan sesquioleate
    • beta-sitosterol
    • xanthan gum
    • sodium benzoate
    • sodium salicylate
    • citronellyl methylcrotonatefragrance material
    • iron oxides/ ci 77491
    • iron oxides / ci 77492
    • iron oxides / ci 77499

    No data in our sources (3)

    • may contain red 6 / ci 15850
    • red 6 lake / ci 15850
    • red 7 lake / ci 15850

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

    What these ingredient tags mean (2)

    These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

    • rich occlusivedimethicone

      • dimethicone: A silicone that forms a film on the surface of the skin without an oily feel. FDA OTC skin protectant monograph, 21 CFR 347.10(g), lists dimethicone as a skin protectant at 1 to 30%.
    • humectantglycerin

      • glycerin: A humectant, and one of the two ingredients a comparison of moisturiser components found made a significant difference to skin hydration. FDA OTC skin protectant monograph, 21 CFR 347.10(h), lists glycerin as a skin protectant at 20 to 45%. On the humectant half: Jeong CB, Han JY, Cho JC, Suh KD, Nam GW, "Analysis of electrical property changes of skin by oil-in-water emulsion components", Int J Cosmet Sci 2013;35(4):402-410, DOI 10.1111/ics.12059, PMID 23621673, found that "glycerine and urea showed significant skin hydration effects compared with other humectants".