Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Julep/Lid Armour, Fawn
Lid Armour, Fawn
Julep

Lid Armour, Fawn

Eye Shadow
Just Chillin' Cooling Shadow Stick

Cleaner pick · Safest eyes we have rated

Revolution

Just Chillin' Cooling Shadow Stick

+68 on ingredient safety

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 12131 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

32OUT OF 100Horrible

Ingredient safety only

range 0–88

32▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
—
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

8-point split

80

Scan

88

Precautionary

88

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

12131 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 88-point gap between the two loudest voices.

0IARC MonographsGovernment
vs
88Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 12131 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

88 pts apart
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · California Proposition 65 · ECHA SVHC Candidate List

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Coverage & match quality

    7 ratings · 1 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Laborno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·31 of 31 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on all 31 listed ingredients.

    Worth a look (4)

    • QUARTZ9/10abrasiveraters disagree

      NTP known carcinogen · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • TITANIUM DIOXIDE8/10uv filter · uv absorber · colorantraters disagree

      ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

    • TALC6/10abrasive · absorbent · anticakingraters disagree

      IARC probable carcinogen (Group 2A) · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

    • PHENOXYETHANOL4/10preservative · antimicrobialraters disagree

      Mild sensitizer for some · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    ✓No flags in our sources (27)

    • ISODODECANE
    • BEESWAX
    • HYDROGENATED COCO-GLYCERIDES
    • QUATERNIUM-90 BENTONITE
    • BORON NITRIDE
    • TRIMETHYLSILOXYSILICATE
    • DIMETHICONE/VINYL DIMETHICONE CROSSPOLYMER
    • CERA MICROCRISTALLINA
    • COCOS NUCIFERA FRUIT EXTRACT
    • PROPYLENE CARBONATE
    • SILICA
    • CETYL PEG/PPG-10/1 DIMETHICONE
    • HEXYL LAURATE
    • POLYGLYCERYL-4 ISOSTEARATE
    • ISOPROPYL TITANIUM TRIISOSTEARATE
    • CAPRYLIC/CAPRIC TRIGLYCERIDE
    • GLYCERINhumectant
    • CAMELLIA SINENSIS LEAF EXTRACT
    • CHAMOMILLA RECUTITA FLOWER EXTRACT
    • PANAX QUINQUEFOLIUS ROOT EXTRACT
    • PROPYLENE GLYCOLcommon irritant
    • TOCOPHEROL
    • MAY CONTAIN: FERRIC FERROCYANIDE
    • IRON OXIDES
    • MANGANESE VIOLET
    • MICA
    • TIN OXIDE
    What these ingredient tags mean (2)

    These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

    • common irritantPROPYLENE GLYCOL

      • PROPYLENE GLYCOL: A solvent that shows up in patch-test clinics, more often as irritation than as allergy. American Contact Dermatitis Society, Allergen of the Year 2018 (Jacob SE, Scheman A, McGowan MA, Dermatitis 2018;29(1):3-5).
    • humectantGLYCERIN

      • GLYCERIN: A humectant, and one of the two ingredients a comparison of moisturiser components found made a significant difference to skin hydration. FDA OTC skin protectant monograph, 21 CFR 347.10(h), lists glycerin as a skin protectant at 20 to 45%. On the humectant half: Jeong CB, Han JY, Cho JC, Suh KD, Nam GW, "Analysis of electrical property changes of skin by oil-in-water emulsion components", Int J Cosmet Sci 2013;35(4):402-410, DOI 10.1111/ics.12059, PMID 23621673, found that "glycerine and urea showed significant skin hydration effects compared with other humectants".