Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Good Clean Love/Re Balance Personal Moisturizing & Cleansing Wipes
Re Balance Personal Moisturizing & Cleansing Wipes
Good Clean Love

Re Balance Personal Moisturizing & Cleansing Wipes

Babytypically $12–30
Sensitive Baby Wipes, Fragrance Free

Cleaner pick · Safest diapering we have rated

Walgreens

Sensitive Baby Wipes, Fragrance Free

+42 on ingredient safety

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 528 cleaner options →2 in this price band or under

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

58OUT OF 100Fair

Ingredient safety only

range 42–100

58▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
—
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

58-point split

62

Scan

42

Precautionary

100

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

528 found

See better →

Flagged

3 ingredients

What's flagged →

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 58-point gap between the two loudest voices.

42Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
vs
100Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 528 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

58 pts apart
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ANSES Endocrine Disruptors · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Coverage & match quality

    5 ratings · 1 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Laborno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·17 of 17 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on all 17 listed ingredients.

    Worth a look (3)

    • FLAVOR6/10flavouring agent · fragrance ingredientraters disagree

      Undisclosed fragrance blend · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • ALOE BARBADENSIS LEAF JUICE4/10skin conditioningraters disagree

      IARC possible carcinogen (Group 2B) · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    • LACTIC ACID4/10exfoliating acidhumectant · buffering · skin conditioningraters disagree

      Health Canada Hotlist — restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    ✓No flags in our sources (14)

    • WATER
    • MAHONIA AQUIFOLIUM ROOT EXTRACT
    • HYDRASTIS CANADENSIS EXTRACT
    • ALLIUM SATIVUM BULB EXTRACT
    • CALENDULA OFFICINALIS FLOWER EXTRACT
    • LONICERA CAPRIFOLIUM FLOWER EXTRACT
    • LONICERA JAPONICA FLOWER EXTRACT
    • HYDROXYPROPYL GUAR HYDROXYPROPYLTRIMONIUM CHLORIDE
    • DISODIUM COCOAMPHODIACETATE
    • SIMETHICONE
    • GLUCONIC ACID
    • PROPANEDIOL
    • SODIUM BENZOATE
    • POTASSIUM SORBATE
    What these ingredient tags mean (1)

    These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

    • exfoliating acidLACTIC ACID

      • LACTIC ACID: An alpha hydroxy acid that loosens surface skin cells; it also makes skin more sun-sensitive while you use it. FDA, "Guidance for Industry: Labeling for Topically Applied Cosmetic Products Containing Alpha Hydroxy Acids as Ingredients" (announced at 70 FR 1721, 10 January 2005; FDA web pages title it "Labeling for Cosmetics Containing Alpha Hydroxy Acids"), which names this acid and recommends the statement "Sunburn Alert: This product contains an alpha hydroxy acid (AHA) that may increase your skin's sensitivity to the sun and particularly the possibility of sunburn."