Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyOpen data via Open Beauty Facts · no EWG/Yuka scraping
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Dr Teals/Ultra Moisturizing Bath Bombs, Pink Himalayan & Essential Oils (2019 formulation)
Ultra Moisturizing Bath Bombs, Pink Himalayan & Essential Oils (2019 formulation)
Dr Teals

Ultra Moisturizing Bath Bombs, Pink Himalayan & Essential Oils (2019 formulation)

Bath Oil Salts Soak

Dr Teals

Ultra Moisturizing Bath Bombs, Pink Himalayan & Essential Oils (2019 formulation)

Bath Oil Salts Soak

hover a pillar to set the scene →

Your composite

53OUT OF 100Poor

range 48–67

—
Eco

Why this score

58-point split

62

Scan

42

Precautionary

100

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

820 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 58-point gap between the two loudest voices.

42Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
vs
100Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

Cleaner options

See 820 cleaner alternatives

Same category, all safer. We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

See better →

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

58 pts apart
  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: ECHA SVHC Candidate List · IARC Monographs · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens

✓US EPA Safer Choice (SCIL) recognizes 67% of ingredients as safer choices — a marker, never a score.

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Labor

    • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

    Packaging

    • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

    Coverage & match quality

    7 ratings · 3 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    1.0×
    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    How we know the packaging

    Nobody published the material for this product, so it was read from the product photo — the container looks like this, rather than the maker saying so. Treat the packaging score as weaker here than on a product with a declared material.

    A photo also cannot show the resin code moulded into the base, so every plastic container reads as “plastic, unspecified” — the cautious end of the plastics range, not a finding about this particular pack.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·18 of 18 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on all 18 listed ingredients.

    Worth a look (4)

    • FRAGRANCE6/10perfumingraters disagree

      Undisclosed fragrance blend · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • ALCOHOL6/10fragrance · antimicrobial · antifoamingraters disagree

      ANSES endocrine candidate · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    • CITRIC ACID4/10fragrance · chelating · bufferingraters disagree

      Health Canada Hotlist — restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    • CITRUS AURANTIUM BERGAMIA FRUIT OIL4/10perfuming · fragranceraters disagree

      EU-regulated fragrance allergen · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    ✓No flags in our sources (14)

    • SODIUM BICARBONATE
    • MAGNESIUM SULFATE
    • SUCROSE
    • SODIUM CHLORIDE
    • GLYCINE SOJA OIL
    • CITRUS AURANTIUM DULCIS PEEL OIL
    • OCIMUM BASILICUM OIL
    • SIMMONDSIA CHINENSIS SEED OIL
    • PRUNUS AMYGDALUS DULCIS OIL
    • SESAMUM INDICUM SEED OIL
    • MACADAMIA TERNIFOLIA SEED OIL
    • HELIANTHUS ANNUUS SEED OIL
    • HAMAMELIS VIRGINIANA
    • WATER

    Where this came from

    Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfree.peta.org ↗

    Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.