Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/OFRA/Eyeshadow, Buttercup
Eyeshadow, Buttercup
OFRA

Eyeshadow, Buttercup

Eye Shadowtypically $12–30
Liquid Mineral Eyeliner

Cleaner pick · Safest eyes we have rated

Mineral Fusion

Liquid Mineral Eyeliner

+68 on ingredient safety

0.1oz · $17.99 · $179.90/oz

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 10671 cleaner options →6 in this price band or under

Ranked by safety only. We may earn a commission on the link; it never changes the order.

Your composite

32OUT OF 100Horrible

Ingredient safety only

range 0–88

32▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
—
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

8-point split

80

Scan

88

Precautionary

88

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

10671 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 88-point gap between the two loudest voices.

0IARC MonographsGovernment
vs
88Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 10671 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

88 pts apart
  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: ECHA SVHC Candidate List · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · California Proposition 65

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Coverage & match quality

    7 ratings · 1 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Laborno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·12 of 12 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on all 12 listed ingredients.

    Worth a look (4)

    • Quartz9/10abrasiveraters disagree

      NTP known carcinogen · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • CI 778918/10colorantraters disagree

      ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

    • Talc6/10abrasive · absorbent · anticakingraters disagree

      IARC probable carcinogen (Group 2A) · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

    • Phenoxyethanol4/10preservative · antimicrobialraters disagree

      Mild sensitizer for some · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    ✓No flags in our sources (8)

    • Mica
    • Zinc Stearate
    • Ethylhexyl Palmitate
    • Feldspar Powder
    • Kaolin
    • CI 77491
    • CI 77492
    • CI 77499