Benefit
Pomegranate Rose Blush, Pompom
Blush
hover a pillar to set the scene →
Raters split
Ingredient safety
A 40-point gap between the two loudest voices.
42Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
vs82Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredientCleaner options
See 2182 cleaner alternatives
Same category, all safer. We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.
Every rater, every axis
Ingredient safety
40 pts apartIndependent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Also screened, nothing found: California Proposition 65 · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ECHA SVHC Candidate List
Environmental
Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction
Labor
Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Coverage & match quality
6 ratings · 2 of 4 axes
- Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
- Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.
Weighted by what you care about
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+
1.0×
Environmentalno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
1.0×
Packagingno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.
Ingredients, decoded
Data availability
Robust25 of 26 characterized
Our sources have reference data on 25 of 26 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.
Worth a look (4)
ANSES CMR-listedflagged by 5 of 9 lists
Undisclosed fragrance blendflagged by 2 of 9 lists
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists
No flags in our sources (21)
- SYNTHETIC FLUORPHLOGOPITE
- ZINC STEARATE
- LAURYL DIMETHICONE
- DIMETHICONE/VINYL DIMETHICONE CROSSPOLYMER
- PENTAERYTHRITYL TETRAISOSTEARATE
- MICA
- ALUMINA
- CAPRYLYL GLYCOL
- ETHYLHEXYLGLYCERIN
- DEHYDROACETIC ACID
- TRIETHOXYCAPRYLYLSILANE
- LAURETH-4
- STEARIC ACID
- WATER
- VINYL DIMETHICONE/METHICONE SILSESQUIOXANE CROSSPOLYMER
- TOCOPHEROL
- PENTAERYTHRITYL TETRA-DI-T-BUTYL HYDROXYHYDROCINNAMATE
- CI 77491
- CI 77492
- CI 77499
- CI 77007
No data in our sources (1)
Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.
Where this came from
Cruelty-free status recorded from ethicalelephant.com ↗
Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.