Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Tom's of Maine/Floride-Free Propolis & Myrrh Spearmint Toothpaste
Tom's of Maine

Floride-Free Propolis & Myrrh Spearmint Toothpaste

Oral Caretypically under $12
Natural Tooth Powder, Cinnamon

Cleaner pick · Safest oral care we have rated

BEE-OCH Organics

Natural Tooth Powder, Cinnamon

+17 on labor practices

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 81 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. We may earn a commission on the link; it never changes the order.

Your composite

84OUT OF 100Good

range 72–94

96
Safety
—
Eco
72▲▼ split
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

12-point split

88

Scan

100

Precautionary

100

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

81 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Labor

A 33-point gap between the two loudest voices.

55Cruelty-Free CertificationNonprofit
vs
88Open Beauty Facts CertificationsNonprofit
050100

All 81 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

raters agree
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: ANSES Endocrine Disruptors · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · California Proposition 65 · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · IARC Monographs

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Labor

    33 pts apart
    • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

    • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

    Coverage & match quality

    5 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·8 of 9 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 8 of 9 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Worth a look (1)

    • Sodium Lauryl Sulfate4/10cleansing · denaturant · foamingraters disagree

      Transparency concern · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    ✓No flags in our sources (7)

    • Calcium Carbonate
    • Water
    • Glycerin
    • Xylitol
    • Chondrus Crispus
    • Commiphora Myrrha Resin Extract
    • Propolis Extract

    No data in our sources (1)

    • Mentha Viridis Leaf Oil and Other Natural Flavors

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

    Where this came from

    Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfree.peta.org ↗

    Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.