Iman Cosmetics
Luxury Liquid Illuminator, Slay (2020 formulation)
Bronzer Highlighter
Cleaner pick · Safest face we have rated
Tarte
maracuja juicy blush & bronzer multi-stick+28 on ingredient safety
$38
Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Ranked by safety only. We may earn a commission on the link; it never changes the order.
Raters split
Ingredient safety
A 29-point gap between the two loudest voices.
65ANSES Endocrine DisruptorsGovernment
vs94Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredientAll 7388 cleaner options, safest first We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.
Every rater, every axis
Ingredient safety
29 pts apartIndependent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Also screened, nothing found: US NTP Report on Carcinogens · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · California Proposition 65
Environmental
Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction
Packaging
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Coverage & match quality
7 ratings · 2 of 4 axes
- Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
- Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.
Weighted by what you care about
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+
1.0×
Environmentalno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
Laborno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
1.0×
0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.
How we know the packaging
Nobody published the material for this product, so it was read from the product photo — the container looks like this, rather than the maker saying so. Treat the packaging score as weaker here than on a product with a declared material.
A photo also cannot show the resin code moulded into the base, so every plastic container reads as “plastic, unspecified” — the cautious end of the plastics range, not a finding about this particular pack.
Ingredients, decoded
Data availability
Robust19 of 20 characterized
Our sources have reference data on 19 of 20 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.
Worth a look (3)
ANSES CMR-listedflagged by 5 of 9 lists
Persistent / bioaccumulativeflagged by 1 of 9 lists
Mild sensitizer for someflagged by 1 of 9 lists
No flags in our sources (16)
- Isododecane
- Isohexadecane
- Synthetic Fluorphlogopite
- Bis-Diglyceryl Polyacyladipate-2
- Silica Dimethyl Silylate
- Mica
- Phytosteryl Isostearate
- Trimethylsiloxysilicate
- VP/Hexadecene Copolymer
- Propylene Carbonate
- Microcrystalline Wax
- Disteardimonium Hectorite
- Acrylates/Dimethicone Copolymer
- Ethylhexylglycerin
- Tin Oxide
- Iron Oxides
No data in our sources (1)
Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.