Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyOpen data via Open Beauty Facts · no EWG/Yuka scraping
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Da Bomb/Bath Fizzers a Foaming Body Scrub, Sugar Plum (2018 formulation)
Bath Fizzers a Foaming Body Scrub, Sugar Plum (2018 formulation)
Da Bomb

Bath Fizzers a Foaming Body Scrub, Sugar Plum (2018 formulation)

Bath Oil Salts Soak

Da Bomb

Bath Fizzers a Foaming Body Scrub, Sugar Plum (2018 formulation)

Bath Oil Salts Soak

hover a pillar to set the scene →

Your composite

85OUT OF 100Excellent

Ingredient safety only

—
Eco
—
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

52-point split

62

Scan

42

Precautionary

94

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

205 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Cleaner options

See 205 cleaner alternatives

Same category, all safer. We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

See better →

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: US NTP Report on Carcinogens · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · ANSES Endocrine Disruptors · IARC Monographs · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · California Proposition 65

✓US EPA Safer Choice (SCIL) recognizes 58% of ingredients as safer choices — a marker, never a score.

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Coverage & match quality

    1 rating · 1 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Laborno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Good·9 of 12 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 9 of 12 listed ingredients; 3 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Worth a look (3)

    • FRAGRANCE6/10perfumingraters disagree

      Undisclosed fragrance blend · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • CITRIC ACID4/10fragrance · chelating · bufferingraters disagree

      Health Canada Hotlist — restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    • RED 40 LAKE4/10raters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    ✓No flags in our sources (6)

    • SODIUM BICARBONATE
    • ZEA MAYS STARCH
    • PEG-8
    • SODIUM METHYL COCOYL TAURATE
    • SODIUM COCOYL ISETHIONATE
    • POLYSORBATE 80

    No data in our sources (3)

    • CREAM OF TARTAR
    • AOS
    • ISOPRORYL MYRISTATE

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

    Where this came from

    Cruelty-free status recorded from dabombfizzers.com ↗

    Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.