Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Hempz/Yuzu & Starfruit Touch of Summer Moisturizing Gradual Self-Tanning Crme with for Medium Skin Tones, SPF 30
Yuzu & Starfruit Touch of Summer Moisturizing Gradual Self-Tanning Crme with for Medium Skin Tones, SPF 30
Hempz

Yuzu & Starfruit Touch of Summer Moisturizing Gradual Self-Tanning Crme with for Medium Skin Tones, SPF 30

Sun Caretypically under $12
Browning Lotion

Cleaner pick · Safest self-tan we have rated

Poofy Organics

Browning Lotion

+32 on ingredient safety

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 64 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

77OUT OF 100Good

range 73–93

68▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
85
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

40-point split

60

Scan

100

Precautionary

76

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

64 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 40-point gap between the two loudest voices.

60Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependent
vs
100Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 64 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

40 pts apart
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ANSES Endocrine Disruptors · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Labor

    • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates Hempz as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →

    Coverage & match quality

    6 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·21 of 24 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 21 of 24 listed ingredients; 3 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Worth a look (6)

    • Ginkgo Biloba Leaf Extract8/10skin conditioningraters disagree

      Prop 65-listed · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    • Aloe Barbadensis Leaf Water4/10fragranceraters disagree

      IARC possible carcinogen (Group 2B) · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    • Dihydroxyacetone4/10hair dyeing · tanning · skin conditioningraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • CI 172004/10colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • CI 420904/10colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • CI 191404/10colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    ✓No flags in our sources (15)

    • Glycerin
    • Cetearyl Alcohol
    • Cetyl Alcohol
    • Glyceryl Stearate
    • Panthenol
    • Disodium EDTA
    • Butyrospermum Parkii Butter
    • Tocopheryl Acetate
    • Sodium Benzoate
    • Hyaluronic Acid
    • Potassium Sorbate
    • Punica Granatum Extract
    • Rubus Idaeus Seed Extract
    • Cucumis Melo Fruit Extract
    • Caramel

    No data in our sources (3)

    • Hydrolysed Silk
    • Glycyrrhiza Glabra Extract
    • Vitis Vinifera Extract

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

    Where this came from

    Cruelty-free status recorded from leapingbunny.org ↗

    Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.