Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Cover FX/Custom Enhancer Drops, Moonlight
Custom Enhancer Drops, Moonlight
Cover FX

Custom Enhancer Drops, Moonlight

Bronzer Highlighter
maracuja juicy blush & bronzer multi-stick

Cleaner pick · Safest face we have rated

Tarte

maracuja juicy blush & bronzer multi-stick

+16 on ingredient safety

$38

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 1896 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. We may earn a commission on the link; it never changes the order.

Your composite

84OUT OF 100Good

Ingredient safety only

range 75–100

84▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
—
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

lenses agree

100

Scan

100

Precautionary

100

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

1896 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 25-point gap between the two loudest voices.

75California Safe Cosmetics ProgramGovernment
vs
100Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 1896 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

25 pts apart
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Low-confidence auto-match — it may describe a different size or variant. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · IARC Monographs · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ANSES Endocrine Disruptors · ECHA SVHC Candidate List

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Coverage & match quality

    4 ratings · 1 of 4 axes

    • At least one rating was auto-linked to this product on a low-confidence match, so it may describe a different size or variant.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Laborno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·6 of 7 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 6 of 7 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    ✓No flags in our sources (6)

    • Hydrogenated Polyisobutene
    • Mica
    • Hydrogenated Styrene/Isoprene Copolymer
    • Triethoxycaprylylsilane
    • 1,2-Hexanediol
    • Iron Oxides

    No data in our sources (1)

    • Caprylyl Glycol May Contain/Peut Contenir: Titanium Dioxide

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.