Avon
Farm Rx Super Greens Refreshing Gel Cleanser
Facial Cleanser
hover a pillar to set the scene →
Cleaner options
See 189 cleaner alternatives
Same category, all safer. We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.
Every rater, every axis
Ingredient safety
raters agreeIndependent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Also screened, nothing found: ECHA SVHC Candidate List · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)
US EPA Safer Choice (SCIL) recognizes 50% of ingredients as safer choices — a marker, never a score.
Packaging
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Coverage & match quality
4 ratings · 2 of 4 axes
- Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
- Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.
Weighted by what you care about
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+
1.0×
Environmentalno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
Laborno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
1.0×
0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.
What we know about the packaging
Partly identified1 of 2 identified
1 of 2 packaging components is a named material; Plastic (unspecified) is recorded only in general terms, so that part of the score is a stand-in.
- Recorded only as “plastic” — no resin code. It could be PET (#1) (widely recyclable) or PVC (#3) (hard to recycle); nothing on record says which, so it counts as 46 out of 100, the middle of that range.
This says how precisely the packaging is described, not how good it is — a fully identified material can still be a bad one.
How we know the packaging
Nobody published the material for this product, so it was read from the product photo — the container looks like this, rather than the maker saying so. Treat the packaging score as weaker here than on a product with a declared material.
A photo also cannot show the resin code moulded into the base, so every plastic container reads as “plastic, unspecified” — the cautious end of the plastics range, not a finding about this particular pack.
Ingredients, decoded
Data availability
Robust26 of 28 characterized
Our sources have reference data on 26 of 28 listed ingredients; 2 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.
Worth a look (4)
EU microplastics-restrictedflagged by 1 of 9 lists
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists
Health Canada Hotlist — restrictedflagged by 1 of 9 lists
IARC possible carcinogen (Group 2B)flagged by 1 of 9 lists
No flags in our sources (22)
- WATER/EAU
- GLYCERIN
- SODIUM COCOYL ALANINATE
- COCO-BETAINE
- LAURAMIDOPROPYL BETAINE
- COCO-GLUCOSIDE
- SODIUM CHLORIDE
- CAPRYLYL GLYCOL
- SODIUM BENZOATE
- p-ANISIC ACID
- ETHYLHEXYLGLYCERIN
- ROSMARINUS OFFICINALIS LEAF OIL
- SODIUM GLUCONATE
- BUTYLENE GLYCOL
- MORINGA OLEIFERA SEED OIL
- BRASSICA OLERACEA GEMMIFERA EXTRACT
- BRASSICA OLERACEA ITALICA SPROUT EXTRACT
- CAMELLIA SINENSIS LEAF EXTRACT
- ACHILLEA MILLEFOLIUM EXTRACT
- CALENDULA OFFICINALIS FLOWER EXTRACT
- LAVANDULA ANGUSTIFOLIA FLOWER/LEAF/STEM EXTRACT
- SALVIA OFFICINALIS EXTRACT
No data in our sources (2)
Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.
Where this came from
Cruelty-free status recorded from avonworldwide.com ↗
Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.