Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyOpen data via Open Beauty Facts · no EWG/Yuka scraping
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Sigma/Beauty Lash Icon Lengthening & Vlumizing Tubing Mascara
Beauty Lash Icon Lengthening & Vlumizing Tubing Mascara
Sigma

Beauty Lash Icon Lengthening & Vlumizing Tubing Mascara

uncategorized

Sigma

Beauty Lash Icon Lengthening & Vlumizing Tubing Mascara

uncategorized

hover a pillar to set the scene →

Your composite

87OUT OF 100Excellent

range 83–93

—
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

lenses agree

100

Scan

100

Precautionary

100

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Alternatives

No category on file, so no fair comparison.

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 20-point gap between the two loudest voices.

80ANSES Endocrine DisruptorsGovernment
vs
100Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

20 pts apart
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: IARC Monographs · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)

✓US EPA Safer Choice (SCIL) recognizes 67% of ingredients as safer choices — a marker, never a score.

Environmental

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

Coverage & match quality

5 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

  • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
  • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

Weighted by what you care about

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

+
1.0×
1.0×
Laborno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

Packagingno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

Ingredients, decoded

Data availability

Robust·21 of 21 characterized

Our sources have reference data on all 21 listed ingredients.

Worth a look (2)

  • Alcohol Denat6/10fragrance · antimicrobial · antifoamingraters disagree

    ANSES endocrine candidate · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • Acrylates Copolymer4/10film forming · antistatic · bindingraters disagree

    EU microplastics-restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

✓No flags in our sources (19)

  • Water
  • Synthetic Beeswax
  • Pvp
  • Copernicia Cerifera Wax
  • Dimethicone
  • Glycerin
  • Glyceryl Stearate
  • Vp/eicosene Copolymer
  • Palmitic Acid
  • Magnesium Aluminum Silicate
  • Stearic Acid
  • 1,2-hexanediol
  • Hydroxyacetophenone
  • Tromethamine
  • Caprylyl Glycol
  • Xanthan Gum
  • Butyrospermum Parkii Butter
  • Ricinus Communis Seed Oil
  • Iron Oxides