Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Wet n Wild/Megalast Lip Color, Ghostly Beings 1230234 (2020 formulation)
Megalast Lip Color, Ghostly Beings 1230234 (2020 formulation)
Wet n Wild

Megalast Lip Color, Ghostly Beings 1230234 (2020 formulation)

Lipstick

Cleaner pick · Safest lips we have rated

VMV Hypoallergenics

Velvet Matte Lipstick

+42 on ingredient safety

$14

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 3934 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

72OUT OF 100Good

range 65–91

58▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
87
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

39-point split

78

Scan

55

Precautionary

94

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

3934 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 49-point gap between the two loudest voices.

45ANSES Endocrine DisruptorsGovernment
vs
94Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 3934 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

49 pts apart
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Labor

    raters agree
    • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates Wet n Wild as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →

    • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

    Coverage & match quality

    7 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·21 of 21 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on all 21 listed ingredients.

    Worth a look (2)

    • TITANIUM DIOXIDE/CI 778918/10raters disagree

      ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

    • BHT7/10fragrance · antioxidantraters disagree

      Endocrine-active · flagged by 3 of 9 lists

    ✓No flags in our sources (19)

    • MICROCRYSTALLINE WAX
    • POLYBUTENE
    • TRIETHYLHEXANOIN
    • DIISOSTEARYL MALATE
    • ETHYLHEXYL PALMITATE
    • PETROLATUMrich occlusive
    • CAPRYLIC/CAPRIC TRIGLYCERIDE
    • SYNTHETIC WAX
    • SILICA
    • DICALCIUM PHOSPHATE
    • CALCIUM CARBONATE
    • POLYHYDROXYSTEARIC ACID
    • STEARALKONIUM HECTORITE
    • LECITHIN
    • ISOSTEARIC ACID
    • ISOPROPYL MYRISTATEcomedogenic in testing
    • PROPYLENE CARBONATE
    • POLYGLYCERYL-3 POLYRICINOLEATE
    • MICA
    What these ingredient tags mean (2)

    These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

    • comedogenic in testingISOPROPYL MYRISTATE

      • ISOPROPYL MYRISTATE: A light emollient, and the ester the rabbit-ear literature names first. Fulton JE Jr, Pay SR, Fulton JE 3rd, "Comedogenicity of current therapeutic products, cosmetics, and ingredients in the rabbit ear", J Am Acad Dermatol 1984;10(1):96-105, PMID 6229554. The openly readable abstract names this ingredient among its "ingredient offenders", in prose and without a numeric rating: "Ingredient offenders include isopropyl myristate and its analogs, such as isopropyl palmitate, isopropyl isostearate, butyl stearate, isostearyl neopentanoate, myristyl myristate..." The rabbit-ear assay rates raw ingredients and does not predict how a finished formula behaves on human skin.
    • rich occlusivePETROLATUM

      • PETROLATUM: A barrier that sits on the surface of the skin, which is also why it feels heavy. FDA OTC skin protectant monograph, 21 CFR 347.10(m) and (r), lists petrolatum and white petrolatum as skin protectants at 30 to 100%.