Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Defy & Inspire/Wear Resistant Nail Lacquer, Chocolate Covered 536 (2020 formulation)
Wear Resistant Nail Lacquer, Chocolate Covered 536 (2020 formulation)
Defy & Inspire

Wear Resistant Nail Lacquer, Chocolate Covered 536 (2020 formulation)

Nail Polish
Nail Polish Remover Acetone free, Lavender

Cleaner pick · Safest nails we have rated

Daylogic

Nail Polish Remover Acetone free, Lavender

+76 on ingredient safety

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 3036 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

24OUT OF 100Horrible

Ingredient safety only

range 10–80

24▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
—
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

10-point split

15

Scan

24

Precautionary

25

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

3036 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 70-point gap between the two loudest voices.

10ANSES Endocrine DisruptorsGovernment
vs
80ECHA SVHC Candidate ListGovernment
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 3036 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

70 pts apart
  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Coverage & match quality

    10 ratings · 1 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Laborno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Good·7 of 9 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 7 of 9 listed ingredients; 2 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Worth a look (3)

    • TOLUENE10/10antioxidant · solventraters disagree

      Reproductive-toxicant concern · flagged by 6 of 9 lists

    • FORMALDEHYDE10/10common irritantpreservative · antimicrobial · denaturantraters disagree

      Carcinogen-linked · flagged by 9 of 9 lists

    • CAMPHOR4/10fragrance · denaturant · plasticiserraters disagree

      EU-regulated fragrance allergen · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    ✓No flags in our sources (4)

    • ETHYL TOSYLAMIDE
    • XYLENE
    • PARABENS
    • TRIPHENYL PHOSPHATE

    No data in our sources (2)

    • 9 FREE - NO DBP
    • FORMALDEHYDE RESIN

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

    What these ingredient tags mean (1)

    These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

    • common irritantFORMALDEHYDE

      • FORMALDEHYDE: A preservative and a recognised contact allergen; the EU prohibits it in cosmetic products. American Contact Dermatitis Society, Allergen of the Year 2015: Pontén A, Bruze M, "Formaldehyde", Dermatitis 2015;26(1):3-6, DOI 10.1097/DER.0000000000000075, PMID 25581665; prohibited in cosmetics by EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009 Annex II entry 1577, inserted by Commission Regulation (EU) 2019/831, which also deleted its Annex III and Annex V entries, so no nail-hardener use survives.