Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Milk Makeup/Blur + Set Matte Loose Setting Powder, Translucent Medium (2020 formulation)
Blur + Set Matte Loose Setting Powder, Translucent Medium (2020 formulation)
Milk Makeup

Blur + Set Matte Loose Setting Powder, Translucent Medium (2020 formulation)

Facial Powder

Milk Makeup

Blur + Set Matte Loose Setting Powder, Translucent Medium (2020 formulation)

Facial Powder

hover a pillar to set the scene →

Your composite

89OUT OF 100Excellent
—
Pkg

Why this score

lenses agree

100

Scan

100

Precautionary

100

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Alternatives

Nothing beats this on safety.

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

raters agree
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: ANSES Endocrine Disruptors · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · California Proposition 65 · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · IARC Monographs · ECHA SVHC Candidate List

Environmental

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

Labor

  • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

Coverage & match quality

5 ratings · 3 of 4 axes

  • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
  • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

Weighted by what you care about

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

+
1.0×
1.0×
1.0×
Packagingno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

Ingredients, decoded

Data availability

Robust·13 of 14 characterized

Our sources have reference data on 13 of 14 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

Worth a look (1)

  • Nylon-124/10opacifying · bulking · viscosity controllingraters disagree

    EU microplastics-restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

✓No flags in our sources (12)

  • Mica/CI 77019
  • lauroyl Lysine
  • zea mays starch
  • silica
  • magnesium myristate
  • caprylic/capric triglyceride
  • persea gratissima fruit extract
  • maltodextrin
  • sodium hyaluronate
  • CI 77492
  • CI 77499
  • ultramarines/CI 77007

No data in our sources (1)

  • methyl methacrylate crosspolymer May contain/peut contenir: iron oxides/CI 77491

Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

Where this came from

Cruelty-free status recorded from leapingbunny.org ↗

Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.