Greenlens

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account
Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Ulta Beauty/Luxe Liquid Lipstick, Milan
Luxe Liquid Lipstick, Milan
Ulta Beauty

Luxe Liquid Lipstick, Milan

uncategorized

Cleaner pick · Safest lips we have rated

VMV Hypoallergenics

Velvet Matte Lipstick

+58 on ingredient safety

$14

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 9346 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

64OUT OF 100Fair

range 57–84

42▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
85
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

36-point split

28

Scan

42

Precautionary

64

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

9346 found

See better →

Flagged

8 ingredients

What's flagged →

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 54-point gap between the two loudest voices.

28Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependent
vs
82IARC MonographsGovernment
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 9346 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

54 pts apart
  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. This score changed Sep 1, 2026: source data updated. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. This score changed Sep 1, 2026: source data updated. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · California Proposition 65 · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ECHA SVHC Candidate List

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Labor

    • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates Ulta Beauty as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →

    Coverage & match quality

    6 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·28 of 31 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 28 of 31 listed ingredients; 3 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Worth a look (8)

    • MAY CONTAIN: TITANIUM DIOXIDE8/10raters disagree

      ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists →

    • FRAGRANCE6/10undeclared fragrance blendperfumingraters disagree

      Undisclosed fragrance blend · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • PHENOXYETHANOL4/10preservative · antimicrobialraters disagree

      Mild sensitizer for some · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    • RED 6 LAKE4/10colorantraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • YELLOW 5 LAKE4/10cosmetic colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • RED 21 LAKE4/10raters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • BLUE 1 LAKE4/10cosmetic colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • RED 28 LAKE4/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    ✓No flags in our sources (20)

    • POLYBUTENE
    • RICINUS COMMUNIS SEED OIL
    • MANGO BUTTER DIMER DILINOLEYL ESTERS/DIMER DILINOLEATE COPOLYMER
    • HYDROGENATED POLYISOBUTENE
    • HYDROGENATED POLYDECENE
    • MICA
    • STEARYL/PPG-3 MYRISTYL ETHER DIMER DILINOLEATE
    • SILICA DIMETHYL SILYLATE
    • SYNTHETIC WAX
    • ISOHEXADECANE
    • DIPHENYLSILOXY PHENYL TRIMETHICONE
    • PPG-3 BENZYL ETHER MYRISTATE
    • HYDROGENATED POLYCYCLOPENTADIENE
    • ISODODECANE
    • DILINOLEIC ACID
    • BORON NITRIDE
    • BUTYROSPERMUM PARKII BUTTER
    • SIMMONDSIA CHINENSIS SEED OIL
    • PERSEA GRATISSIMA OIL
    • COCOS NUCIFERA OIL

    No data in our sources (3)

    • DIISOPROPYL DIMER DILIONEATE
    • BEESWAX/CIRE D'ABEILLE
    • IRON OXIDES RED 7

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

    What these ingredient tags mean (1)

    These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

    • undeclared fragrance blendFRAGRANCE

      • FRAGRANCE: A blend the label does not itemize, so what is in it cannot be read from the ingredient list. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009 permits the collective term "parfum"; the SCCS Opinion on Fragrance Allergens (SCCS/1459/11) reviews the contact-allergy evidence for the substances it can contain.

    Where this came from

    Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfree.peta.org ↗

    Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.