Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Colourpop/Serum Blush, Bubbles
Colourpop

Serum Blush, Bubbles

Blushtypically under $12
Fruit Pigmented Blush, Peppermint Candy

Cleaner pick · Safest blush we have rated

100% PURE

Fruit Pigmented Blush, Peppermint Candy

+65 on ingredient safety

$30–70

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 2637 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. We may earn a commission on the link; it never changes the order.

Colourpop

Serum Blush, Bubbles

Blush

hover a pillar to set the scene →

Your composite

57OUT OF 100Fair

range 44–86

—
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

83-point split

10

Scan

93

Precautionary

46

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

2637 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 83-point gap between the two loudest voices.

10Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependent
vs
93Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 2637 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

83 pts apart
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: California Proposition 65 · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · ECHA SVHC Candidate List

Environmental

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

Coverage & match quality

6 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

  • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
  • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

Weighted by what you care about

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

+
1.0×
1.0×
Laborno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

Packagingno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

Ingredients, decoded

Data availability

Robust·47 of 48 characterized

Our sources have reference data on 47 of 48 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

Worth a look (11)

  • titanium dioxide8/10uv filter · uv absorber · colorantraters disagree

    ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

  • phenoxyethanol4/10preservative · antimicrobialraters disagree

    Mild sensitizer for some · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • methyl methacrylate crosspolymer4/10film formingraters disagree

    EU microplastics-restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • blue 1 lake4/10cosmetic colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • red 64/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • red 6 lake4/10colorantraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • red 7 lake4/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • red 27 lake4/10raters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • red 284/10cosmetic colorant · pigmentraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • red 40 lake4/10raters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • yellow 54/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

✓No flags in our sources (36)

  • water
  • isododecane
  • peg-10 dimethicone
  • butylene glycol
  • dimethicone
  • ethylhexyl isononanoate
  • triethylhexanoin
  • dicaprylyl carbonate
  • cetyl peg/ppg-10/1 dimethicone
  • glycerin
  • sodium chloride
  • caprylyl glycol
  • diethylhexyl syringylidenemalonate
  • polyglyceryl-2 triisostearate
  • ethylhexylglycerin
  • hexylene glycol
  • caprylic/capric triglyceride
  • tetrahexyldecyl ascorbate
  • tocopheryl acetate
  • triethoxycaprylylsilane
  • sodium hyaluronate
  • aluminum calcium sodium silicate
  • tin oxide
  • synthetic fluorphlogopite
  • calcium sodium borosilicate
  • silica
  • hydrogenated polyisobutene
  • palmitic acid
  • calcium aluminum borosilicate
  • alumina
  • may contain: bismuth oxychloride
  • carmine
  • iron oxides
  • manganese violet
  • mica
  • yellow 6 lake

No data in our sources (1)

  • copper powder

Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

Where this came from

Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfree.peta.org ↗

Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.