Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Lip Smacker/Lip Balm, Sweet Kiwi Kitty Straw Ma Llama Berry (2020 formulation)
Lip Balm, Sweet Kiwi Kitty Straw Ma Llama Berry (2020 formulation)
Lip Smacker

Lip Balm, Sweet Kiwi Kitty Straw Ma Llama Berry (2020 formulation)

Lip Gloss

Cleaner pick · Safest lips we have rated

VMV Hypoallergenics

Velvet Matte Lipstick

+67 on ingredient safety

$14

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 9342 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

59OUT OF 100Fair

range 51–84

33▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
85
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

48-point split

16

Scan

42

Precautionary

64

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

9342 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 66-point gap between the two loudest voices.

16Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependent
vs
82IARC MonographsGovernment
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 9342 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

66 pts apart
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Labor

    • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates Lip Smacker as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →

    Coverage & match quality

    6 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·38 of 39 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 38 of 39 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Worth a look (10)

    • TITANIUM DIOXIDE8/10uv filter · uv absorber · colorantraters disagree

      ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

    • BHT7/10fragrance · antioxidantraters disagree

      Endocrine-active · flagged by 3 of 9 lists

    • FLAVOR/AROMA6/10raters disagree

      Undisclosed fragrance blend · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • OCTOCRYLENE6/10uv filter · uv absorber · light stabilizerraters disagree

      Strong contact sensitizer · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    • PHENOXYETHANOL4/10preservative · antimicrobialraters disagree

      Mild sensitizer for some · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    • MAY CONTAIN: BLUE 1 LAKE4/10raters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • RED 64/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • RED 7 LAKE4/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • RED 28 LAKE4/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • YELLOW 5 LAKE4/10cosmetic colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    ✓No flags in our sources (28)

    • ISOPROPYL PALMITATE
    • POLYBUTENE
    • CAPRYLIC/CAPRIC TRIGLYCERIDE
    • HYDROGENATED POLYDECENE
    • ETHYLHEXYL PALMITATE
    • OZOKERITE
    • BUTYROSPERMUM PARKII BUTTER
    • COPERNICIA CERIFERA WAX/CIRE DE CARNAUBA
    • BUTYLENE/ETHYLENE/STYRENE COPOLYMER
    • ETHYLENE/PROPYLENE/STYRENE COPOLYMER
    • MICROCRYSTALLINE WAX
    • SORBIC ACID
    • CALCIUM ALUMINUM BOROSILICATE
    • MINERAL OIL/HUILE MINERALE
    • SUCRALOSE
    • PENTAERYTHRITYL TETRA-DI-T-BUTYL HYDROXYHYDROCINNAMATE
    • ETHYLHEXYLGLYCERIN
    • BISABOLOL
    • CALCIUM TITANIUM BOROSILICATE
    • TOCOPHEROL
    • SILICA
    • ALUMINA
    • GLYCINE SOJA OIL
    • SYNTHETIC FLUORPHLOGOPITE
    • TIN OXIDE
    • CALCIUM SODIUM BOROSILICATE
    • CARMINE
    • MICA

    No data in our sources (1)

    • BEESWAX/CIRE D'ABEILLE

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

    Where this came from

    Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfree.peta.org ↗

    Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.