Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Too Faced/Natural Face, Pink Wink (2018 formulation)
Too Faced

Natural Face, Pink Wink (2018 formulation)

Bronzer Highlighter

Too Faced

Natural Face, Pink Wink (2018 formulation)

Bronzer Highlighter

hover a pillar to set the scene →

Your composite

52OUT OF 100Poor

range 44–74

—
Pkg

Why this score

42-point split

0

Scan

42

Precautionary

20

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

2941 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 90-point gap between the two loudest voices.

0Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependent
vs
90EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)Government
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

Cleaner options

See 2941 cleaner alternatives

Same category, all safer. We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

See better →

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

90 pts apart

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ECHA SVHC Candidate List

Environmental

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

Labor

  • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

Coverage & match quality

9 ratings · 3 of 4 axes

  • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
  • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

Weighted by what you care about

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

+
1.0×
1.0×
1.0×
Packagingno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

Ingredients, decoded

Data availability

Robust·30 of 30 characterized

Our sources have reference data on all 30 listed ingredients.

Worth a look (12)

  • Red 30 Lake8/10raters disagree

    EU-prohibited · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • Titanium Dioxide8/10uv filter · uv absorber · colorantraters disagree

    ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

  • Talc6/10abrasive · absorbent · anticakingraters disagree

    IARC probable carcinogen (Group 2A) · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

  • Benzyl Alcohol6/10preservative · perfuming · solventraters disagree

    EU harmonised skin sensitizer · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • Coumarin6/10perfumingraters disagree

    ANSES endocrine candidate · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • Fragrance/Parfum6/10perfumingraters disagree

    Undisclosed fragrance blend · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • Nylon-124/10opacifying · bulking · viscosity controllingraters disagree

    EU microplastics-restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • Phenoxyethanol4/10preservative · antimicrobialraters disagree

    Mild sensitizer for some · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • Vanillin4/10fragranceraters disagree

    EU-regulated fragrance allergen · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • Red 7 Lake4/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • Yellow 5 Lake4/10cosmetic colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • Red 28 Lake4/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

✓No flags in our sources (18)

  • Mica
  • Cetearyl Isononanoate
  • Dimethicone
  • Boron Nitride
  • Zinc Stearate
  • Sodium Saccharin
  • Cocos Nucifera Oil/Cocos Nucifera Oil
  • Ethylene/Acrylic Acid Copolymer
  • Hydrogenated Coconut Oil
  • Poloxamer 338
  • Silica
  • Sodium Dehydroacetate
  • Sorbic Acid
  • Tin Oxide
  • Tocopherol
  • Carmine
  • Iron Oxides
  • Manganese Violet

Where this came from

Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfree.peta.org ↗

Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.