Greenlens

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account
Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Not a Branded Item/Hand Lotion, Snow Flurries (2018 formulation)
NA
Not a Branded Item

Hand Lotion, Snow Flurries (2018 formulation)

uncategorized

Your composite

60OUT OF 100Fair

range 53–77

30▲▼ split
Safety
90
Eco
—
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

48-point split

16

Scan

38

Precautionary

64

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Alternatives

No fair cohort on file, so no comparison.

Flagged

10 ingredients

What's flagged →

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 48-point gap between the two loudest voices.

16Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependent
vs
64Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

48 pts apart

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. This score changed Sep 1, 2026: source data updated. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. This score changed Sep 1, 2026: source data updated. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · California Proposition 65 · IARC Monographs

Environmental

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

Coverage & match quality

5 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

  • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
  • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

Weighted by what you care about

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

+
1.0×
1.0×
Laborno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

Packagingno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

Ingredients, decoded

Data availability

Robust·17 of 17 characterized

Our sources have reference data on all 17 listed ingredients.

Worth a look (10)

  • METHYLPARABEN7/10preservative · fragranceraters disagree

    Endocrine-active · flagged by 3 of 9 lists →

  • PROPYLPARABEN7/10preservative · perfumingraters disagree

    Endocrine-active · flagged by 4 of 9 lists →

  • PARFUM6/10undeclared fragrance blendperfuming · fragranceraters disagree

    Undisclosed fragrance blend · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

  • PHENOXYETHANOL4/10preservative · antimicrobialraters disagree

    Mild sensitizer for some · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

  • CARBOMER4/10emulsion stabilising · gel forming · viscosity controllingraters disagree

    EU microplastics-restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

  • SODIUM HYDROXIDE4/10buffering · denaturantraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

  • MAY CONTAIN: FD&C YELLOW NO.54/10raters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

  • D&C RED NO.334/10raters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

  • FD&C BLUE NO. 14/10raters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

  • FD&C RED NO.44/10raters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

✓No flags in our sources (7)

  • WATER
  • PARAFFINUM LIQUIDUMrich occlusive
  • GLYCERINhumectant
  • AMMONIUM POLYACRYLATE
  • C13-16 ISOPARAFFIN
  • LAURETH-30
  • CETEARYL ALCOHOL
What these ingredient tags mean (3)

These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

  • undeclared fragrance blendPARFUM

    • PARFUM: A blend the label does not itemize, so what is in it cannot be read from the ingredient list. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009 permits the collective term "parfum"; the SCCS Opinion on Fragrance Allergens (SCCS/1459/11) reviews the contact-allergy evidence for the substances it can contain.

  • rich occlusivePARAFFINUM LIQUIDUM

    • PARAFFINUM LIQUIDUM: A refined oil that sits on the surface of the skin; it has a heavy finish. FDA OTC skin protectant monograph, 21 CFR 347.10(l): "Mineral oil, 50 to 100 percent; 30 to 35 percent in combination with colloidal oatmeal in accordance with 347.20(a)(4)."

  • humectantGLYCERIN

    • GLYCERIN: A humectant, and one of the two ingredients a comparison of moisturiser components found made a significant difference to skin hydration. FDA OTC skin protectant monograph, 21 CFR 347.10(h), lists glycerin as a skin protectant at 20 to 45%. On the humectant half: Jeong CB, Han JY, Cho JC, Suh KD, Nam GW, "Analysis of electrical property changes of skin by oil-in-water emulsion components", Int J Cosmet Sci 2013;35(4):402-410, DOI 10.1111/ics.12059, PMID 23621673, found that "glycerine and urea showed significant skin hydration effects compared with other humectants".