Almay
Healthy Hue Blush, 100 Nearly Nude
Blush
Cleaner pick · Safest face we have rated
Tarte
maracuja juicy blush & bronzer multi-stick+64 on ingredient safety
$38
Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Ranked by safety only. We may earn a commission on the link; it never changes the order.
Raters split
Ingredient safety
A 80-point gap between the two loudest voices.
15Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependent
vs95Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredientAll 16382 cleaner options, safest first We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.
Every rater, every axis
Ingredient safety
80 pts apartIndependent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Also screened, nothing found: California Proposition 65 · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · ECHA SVHC Candidate List
Environmental
Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction
Labor
Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Packaging
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Coverage & match quality
7 ratings · 3 of 4 axes
- Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
- Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.
Weighted by what you care about
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+
1.0×
Environmentalno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
1.0×
1.0×
0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.
How we know the packaging
Nobody published the material for this product, so it was read from the product photo — the container looks like this, rather than the maker saying so. Treat the packaging score as weaker here than on a product with a declared material.
A photo also cannot show the resin code moulded into the base, so every plastic container reads as “plastic, unspecified” — the cautious end of the plastics range, not a finding about this particular pack.
Ingredients, decoded
Data availability
Robust23 of 24 characterized
Our sources have reference data on 23 of 24 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.
Worth a look (2)
EU-prohibitedflagged by 2 of 9 lists
ANSES CMR-listedflagged by 5 of 9 lists
No flags in our sources (21)
- MICA
- SYNTHETIC FLUORPHLOGOPITE
- HDI/TRIMETHYLOL HEXYLLACTONE CROSSPOLYMER
- CETEARYL ETHYLHEXANOATE
- DICALCIUM PHOSPHATE
- SQUALANE
- GLYCERIN
- OCTYLDODECYL STEAROYL STEARATE
- DIMETHICONE
- 1,2-HEXANEDIOL
- CAPRYLYL GLYCOL
- CARRAGEENAN
- ETHYLHEXYLGLYCERIN
- LAUROYL LYSINE
- PENTAERYTHRITYL TETRA-DI-T-BUTYL HYDROXYHYDROCINNAMATE
- POLYSORBATE 20
- SILICA
- XANTHAN GUM
- ZINC STEARATE
- IRON OXIDES
- ULTRAMARINES
No data in our sources (1)
Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.
Where this came from
Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfree.peta.org ↗
Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.