Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Wet n Wild/Fm Glitter Liner, Bewitched 1230248 (2020 formulation)
Fm Glitter Liner, Bewitched 1230248 (2020 formulation)
Wet n Wild

Fm Glitter Liner, Bewitched 1230248 (2020 formulation)

Eye Liner
Just Chillin' Cooling Shadow Stick

Cleaner pick · Safest eyes we have rated

Revolution

Just Chillin' Cooling Shadow Stick

+54 on ingredient safety

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 11386 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

66OUT OF 100Fair

range 58–81

46▲▼ split
Safety
64
Eco
87
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

63-point split

68

Scan

25

Precautionary

88

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

11386 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 65-point gap between the two loudest voices.

25Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
vs
90EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)Government
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 11386 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

65 pts apart
  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist

Environmental

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

Labor

raters agree
  • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates Wet n Wild as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

Coverage & match quality

9 ratings · 3 of 4 axes

  • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
  • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

Weighted by what you care about

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

+
1.0×
1.0×
1.0×
Packagingno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

Ingredients, decoded

Data availability

Robust·30 of 32 characterized

Our sources have reference data on 30 of 32 listed ingredients; 2 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

Worth a look (8)

  • DMDM HYDANTOIN8/10preservativeraters disagree

    Carcinogen-linked · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • TITANIUM DIOXIDE/CI 778918/10raters disagree

    ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

  • METHYLPARABEN7/10preservative · fragranceraters disagree

    Endocrine-active · flagged by 3 of 9 lists

  • IODOPROPYNYL BUTYLCARBAMATE6/10preservativeraters disagree

    EU harmonised skin sensitizer · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • POLYETHYLENE TEREPHTHALATE4/10film formingraters disagree

    EU microplastics-restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • PHENOXYETHANOL4/10preservative · antimicrobialraters disagree

    Mild sensitizer for some · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • ACRYLATES COPOLYMER4/10film forming · antistatic · bindingraters disagree

    EU microplastics-restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • YELLOW 5 LAKE/CI 191404/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

✓No flags in our sources (22)

  • WATER/EAU
  • GLYCERIN
  • PVP
  • BUTYLENE GLYCOL
  • METHYLPROPANEDIOL
  • AMMONIUM ACRYLOYLDIMETHYLTAURATE/VP COPOLYMER
  • PPG-26-BUTETH-26
  • PEG-40 HYDROGENATED CASTOR OIL
  • CAPRYLYL GLYCOL
  • ETHYLHEXYLGLYCERIN
  • PANTHENOL
  • PHENYLPROPANOL
  • POLYURETHANE-33
  • POLYLACTIC ACID
  • POLYURETHANE-11
  • ALUMINUM POWDER/CI 77000
  • CARMINE/CI 75470
  • FERRIC AMMONIUM FERROCYANIDE/CI 77510
  • IRON OXIDES/CI 77491
  • CI 77492
  • CI 77499
  • MICA

No data in our sources (2)

  • VPNA COPOLYMER
  • BLACK 2/CI 77266

Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.