Raters split
Labor
A 33-point gap between the two loudest voices.
Finding shown, score not counted — partial label
This finding stands: the ingredient it names really is on the list we hold. Its 0-100 score does not count toward the pillar, because we only hold part of this label, and a partial list can only ever score too generously.
Also screened, nothing found: US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · California Proposition 65 · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · IARC Monographs
Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction
Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates Aussie as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →
Coverage & match quality
2 ratings · 1 of 4 axes
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
Data availability
Partial list13 shown
Only part of this product's ingredient list could be read from its source, so what is shown here is incomplete. We do not publish a safety score from a partial list.
Worth a look (5)
EU-prohibitedflagged by 2 of 9 lists →
EU-prohibitedflagged by 2 of 9 lists →
Endocrine-activeflagged by 2 of 9 lists →
ANSES endocrine candidateflagged by 1 of 9 lists →
Undisclosed fragrance blendflagged by 2 of 9 lists →
No flags in our sources (8)
These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.
commonly dryingALCOHOL DENAT
undeclared fragrance blendFRAGRANCE