It Cosmetics
Celebration Foundation Illumination, Light
uncategorized
hover a pillar to set the scene →
Raters split
Labor
A 58-point gap between the two loudest voices.
30Cruelty-Free CertificationNonprofit
vs88Open Beauty Facts CertificationsNonprofit
050100
Every rater, every axis
Ingredient safety
30 pts apartIndependent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Also screened, nothing found: California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)
Environmental
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Labor
58 pts apartRun by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Coverage & match quality
8 ratings · 3 of 4 axes
- Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
- Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.
Weighted by what you care about
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+
1.0×
1.0×
1.0×
Packagingno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.
Ingredients, decoded
Data availability
Robust40 of 41 characterized
Our sources have reference data on 40 of 41 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.
Worth a look (4)
ANSES CMR-listedflagged by 5 of 9 lists
Mild sensitizer for someflagged by 1 of 9 lists
IARC possible carcinogen (Group 2B)flagged by 1 of 9 lists
EU microplastics-restrictedflagged by 1 of 9 lists
No flags in our sources (36)
- ZINC OXIDE
- LAUROYL LYSINE
- ETHYLHEXYL PALMITATE
- ZINC STEARATE
- SILICA
- AQUA/WATER/EAU
- GLYCERIN
- NIACINAMIDE
- ETHYLHEXYLGLYCERIN
- TOCOPHEROL
- GLYCINE SOJA OIL/SOYBEAN OIL
- SILICA DIMETHYL SILYLATE
- ASCORBYL PALMITATE
- HYDROLYZED SILK
- OLEA EUROPAEA FRUIT EXTRACT/OLIVE FRUIT EXTRACT
- ROSA CANINA FRUIT EXTRACT
- CAMELLIA OLEIFERA LEAF EXTRACT
- CAMELLIA SINENSIS LEAF EXTRACT
- PUNICA GRANATUM EXTRACT
- CARICA PAPAYA FRUIT EXTRACT/PAPAYA FRUIT EXTRACT
- VITIS VINIFERA SEED EXTRACT/GRAPE SEED EXTRACT
- CHAMOMILLA RECUTITA FLOWER EXTRACT/MATRICARIA FLOWER EXTRACT
- BUTYLENE GLYCOL
- TIN OXIDE
- SODIUM HYALURONATE
- HYDROLYZED COLLAGEN
- SODIUM LACTATE
- SODIUM BENZOATE
- POLYSORBATE 20
- DISODIUM EDTA
- PALMITOYL TRIPEPTIDE-1
- PALMITOYL TETRAPEPTIDE-7
- MICA
- CI 77491
- CI 77492
- CI 77499/IRON OXIDES
No data in our sources (1)
Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.
Where this came from
Cruelty-free status recorded from peta.org ↗
Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.