Greenlens

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account
Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Sephora/Collection Rouge Lacquer Long-Lasting Lipstick, 33 Success Story, High Shine
Sephora

Collection Rouge Lacquer Long-Lasting Lipstick, 33 Success Story, High Shine

Lip Liner

Cleaner pick · Safest lips we have rated

VMV Hypoallergenics

Velvet Matte Lipstick

+51 on ingredient safety

$14

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 8067 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

40OUT OF 100Horrible

range 33–58

49▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
30
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

40-point split

36

Scan

42

Precautionary

76

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

8067 found

See better →

Flagged

7 ingredients

What's flagged →

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 49-point gap between the two loudest voices.

36Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependent
vs
85Health Canada Ingredient HotlistGovernment
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 8067 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

49 pts apart
  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: ECHA SVHC Candidate List · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · California Proposition 65

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Labor

    • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates Sephora as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →

    Coverage & match quality

    7 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·36 of 36 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on all 36 listed ingredients.

    Worth a look (7)

    • CI 778918/10colorantraters disagree

      ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists →

    • BHT7/10fragrance · antioxidantraters disagree

      Endocrine-active · flagged by 3 of 9 lists →

    • Parfum6/10undeclared fragrance blendperfuming · fragranceraters disagree

      Undisclosed fragrance blend · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • CI 454104/10colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • CI 158504/10colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • CI 191404/10colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • Citric Acid4/10fragrance · chelating · bufferingraters disagree

      Health Canada Hotlist — restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    ✓No flags in our sources (29)

    • Bis-Diglyceryl Polyacyladipate-2
    • Octyldodecanol
    • Ricinus Communis Seed Oil
    • Polybutene
    • Pentaerythrityl Tetraisostearate
    • C12-15 Alkyl Benzoate
    • Hydrogenated Polydecene
    • Hydrogenated Polyisobutene
    • Hydrogenated Styrene/Methyl Styrene/Indene Copolymer
    • Methyl Hydrogenated Rosinate
    • Cera Microcristallina
    • Synthetic Wax
    • Calcium Aluminum Borosilicate
    • Zea Mays Starch
    • Ethylene/Propylene Copolymer
    • CI 15985
    • Limnanthes Alba Seed Oil
    • Butyrospermum Parkii Butter )
    • Stearalkonium Hectorite
    • Propylene Carbonate
    • Mangifera Indica Seed Butter
    • Ammonium Glycyrrhizatefragrance material
    • Helianthus Annuus Seed Oil
    • Pentaerythrityl Tetra-Di-T-Butyl Hydroxyhydrocinnamate
    • Glyceryl Stearate Citrate
    • Tocopherol
    • Ascorbyl Tetraisopalmitate
    • Beta-Sitosterol
    • Squalene
    What these ingredient tags mean (1)

    These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

    • undeclared fragrance blendParfum

      • Parfum: A blend the label does not itemize, so what is in it cannot be read from the ingredient list. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009 permits the collective term "parfum"; the SCCS Opinion on Fragrance Allergens (SCCS/1459/11) reviews the contact-allergy evidence for the substances it can contain.

    Where this came from

    Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfree.peta.org ↗

    Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.