Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Aesop/Nurture Bar Soap
Nurture Bar Soap
Aesop

Nurture Bar Soap

Bar Soap
Bio Therapy Body Wash

Cleaner pick · Safest wash & scrub we have rated

Africology Skincare & Spa

Bio Therapy Body Wash

+41 on ingredient safety

250ml · 60 ZAR · 24 ZAR/100 ml

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 1563 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. We may earn a commission on the link; it never changes the order.

Your composite

65OUT OF 100Fair

range 59–79

59▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
55
Labor
82
Pkg

Why this score

12-point split

88

Scan

100

Precautionary

100

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

1563 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 60-point gap between the two loudest voices.

40ANSES Endocrine DisruptorsGovernment
vs
100Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 1563 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

60 pts apart
  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · IARC Monographs · ECHA SVHC Candidate List

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Labor

    • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

    Packaging

    • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

    Coverage & match quality

    8 ratings · 3 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    1.0×
    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    How we know the packaging

    Nobody published the material for this product, so it was read from the product photo — the container looks like this, rather than the maker saying so. Treat the packaging score as weaker here than on a product with a declared material.

    A photo also cannot show the resin code moulded into the base, so every plastic container reads as “plastic, unspecified” — the cautious end of the plastics range, not a finding about this particular pack.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·21 of 21 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on all 21 listed ingredients.

    Worth a look (9)

    • Citral7/10perfuming · flavouringraters disagree

      ANSES endocrine candidate · flagged by 3 of 9 lists

    • Limonene7/10perfuming · deodorant · solventraters disagree

      ANSES endocrine candidate · flagged by 3 of 9 lists

    • Linalool6/10perfuming · deodorantraters disagree

      EU harmonised skin sensitizer · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • Eugenol6/10perfuming · denaturant · tonicraters disagree

      ANSES endocrine candidate · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • Geraniol6/10perfuming · tonicraters disagree

      EU harmonised skin sensitizer · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • Cedrus Atlantica Bark Oil4/10perfuming · fragrance · skin conditioningraters disagree

      EU-regulated fragrance allergen · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    • Eugenia Caryophyllus Flower Oil4/10fragranceraters disagree

      EU-regulated fragrance allergen · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    • Citric Acid4/10fragrance · chelating · bufferingraters disagree

      Health Canada Hotlist — restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    • Cymbopogon Schoenanthus Oil4/10fragrance · tonicraters disagree

      EU-regulated fragrance allergen · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    ✓No flags in our sources (12)

    • Sodium Palmate
    • Sodium Palm Kernelate
    • Water
    • Glycerin
    • Butyrospermum Parkii Butter
    • Lavandula Angustifolia Oil
    • Sodium Citrate
    • Tetrasodium Glutamate Diacetate
    • Rosmarinus Officinalis Leaf Oil
    • Sodium Chloride
    • Tocopherol
    • Glycine Soja Oil

    Where this came from

    Cruelty-free status recorded from us.assistance.aesop.com ↗

    Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.