Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/MAC/Lipglass, 310 Please Me
Lipglass, 310 Please Me
MAC

Lipglass, 310 Please Me

Lip Gloss

Cleaner pick · Safest lips we have rated

VMV Hypoallergenics

Velvet Matte Lipstick

+74 on ingredient safety

$14

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 10145 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

28OUT OF 100Horrible

range 15–62

26▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
30
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

93-point split

0

Scan

93

Precautionary

20

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

10145 found

See better →

Flagged

8 ingredients

What's flagged →

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 93-point gap between the two loudest voices.

0Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependent
vs
93Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 10145 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

93 pts apart
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: California Proposition 65 · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Labor

    • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates MAC as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →

    Coverage & match quality

    6 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·29 of 34 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 29 of 34 listed ingredients; 5 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Worth a look (8)

    • TITANIUM DIOXIDE8/10uv filter · uv absorber · colorantraters disagree

      ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists →

    • RED 30 LAKE8/10raters disagree

      EU-prohibited · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • VANILLIN4/10fragrance materialfragranceraters disagree

      EU-regulated fragrance allergen · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    • PHENOXYETHANOL4/10preservative · antimicrobialraters disagree

      Mild sensitizer for some · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    • BLUE 1 LAKE4/10cosmetic colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • RED 33 LAKE4/10raters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • YELLOW 54/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • YELLOW 5 LAKE4/10cosmetic colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    ✓No flags in our sources (21)

    • HYDROGENATED POLYISOBUTENE
    • SIMMONDSIA CHINENSIS OIL
    • OCTYLDODECANOL
    • TOCOPHERYL ACETATE
    • COCOS NUCIFERA OIL
    • PRUNUS ARMENIACA
    • CALCIUM SODIUM BOROSILICATE
    • ALUMINUM CALCIUM SODIUM SILICATE
    • CALCIUM ALUMINUM BOROSILICATE
    • TIN OXIDE
    • SILICA
    • ALUMINA
    • PROPYLENE CARBONATE
    • DISTEARDIMONIUM HECTORITE
    • ETHYLHEXYL HYDROXYSTEARATE
    • MICA
    • IRON OXIDES
    • IRON OXIDES )CI 77499)
    • BISMUTH OXYCHLORIDE
    • CARMINE
    • YELLOW 6 LAKE

    No data in our sources (5)

    • COPERNICIA CERIFERA WAXCOPERNICIA CERIFERA CERACIRE DE CARNAUBA
    • KERNEL OIL
    • SYNTHETIC FLURPHLOGOPITE
    • TITANIUM DIOXIDE IRON OXIDES
    • BRONZE POWDER

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

    Where this came from

    Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfree.peta.org ↗

    Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.