Dior
Diorshow Liquid Liner, 881 Satin Burgundy
Eye Liner
Cleaner pick · Safest eyes we have rated
Revolution
Just Chillin' Cooling Shadow Stick+15 on ingredient safety
Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.
Raters split
Ingredient safety
A 20-point gap between the two loudest voices.
80Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependent
vs100Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredientAll 2222 cleaner options, safest first We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.
Every rater, every axis
Ingredient safety
20 pts apartIndependent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Also screened, nothing found: US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ANSES Endocrine Disruptors · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · California Proposition 65 · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · IARC Monographs · ECHA SVHC Candidate List
Recognized on a safer-ingredients list: US EPA Safer Choice recognizes 59% of ingredients as safer choices — a marker, never a score.
Environmental
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Labor
Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates Dior as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →
Coverage & match quality
5 ratings · 3 of 4 axes
- Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
- Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.
Weighted by what you care about
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+
1.0×
1.0×
1.0×
Packagingno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.
Ingredients, decoded
Data availability
Robust29 of 29 characterized
Our sources have reference data on all 29 listed ingredients.
Worth a look (3)
EU microplastics-restrictedflagged by 1 of 9 lists →
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists →
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists →
No flags in our sources (26)
- AQUA
- AMMONIUM STYRENE/ACRYLATES COPOLYMER
- BUTYLENE GLYCOL
- PENTYLENE GLYCOL
- GLYCERINhumectant
- 1,2-HEXANEDIOL
- CENTAUREA CYANUS FLOWER WATER
- SODIUM DEHYDROACETATE
- HYDROXYACETOPHENONE
- MALTODEXTRIN
- CAPRYLYL GLYCOL
- CHARCOAL POWDER
- BENTONITE
- BEHENETH-30
- SODIUM POLYASPARTATE
- ETHYLHEXYLGLYCERIN
- SODIUM LAURETH SULFATE
- AMMONIUM ACRYLATES COPOLYMER
- CAMELLIA OLEIFERA SEED OIL
- DISODIUM EDTA
- SODIUM BENZOATE
- POTASSIUM SORBATE
- TOCOPHEROL
- CI 77007
- CI 75470
- CI 77491
What these ingredient tags mean (1)
These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.
humectantGLYCERIN
- GLYCERIN: A humectant, and one of the two ingredients a comparison of moisturiser components found made a significant difference to skin hydration. FDA OTC skin protectant monograph, 21 CFR 347.10(h), lists glycerin as a skin protectant at 20 to 45%. On the humectant half: Jeong CB, Han JY, Cho JC, Suh KD, Nam GW, "Analysis of electrical property changes of skin by oil-in-water emulsion components", Int J Cosmet Sci 2013;35(4):402-410, DOI 10.1111/ics.12059, PMID 23621673, found that "glycerine and urea showed significant skin hydration effects compared with other humectants".
Where this came from
Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfree.peta.org ↗
Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.