Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Colourpop/Blush Stix, Mic Drop
Blush Stix, Mic Drop
Colourpop

Blush Stix, Mic Drop

Blushtypically under $12
maracuja juicy blush & bronzer multi-stick

Cleaner pick · Safest face we have rated

Tarte

maracuja juicy blush & bronzer multi-stick

+59 on ingredient safety, gives up 11 on labor practices

$38

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 14375 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. We may earn a commission on the link; it never changes the order.

Your composite

57OUT OF 100Fair

range 50–75

41▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
85
Labor
46
Pkg

Why this score

73-point split

20

Scan

93

Precautionary

52

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

14375 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 73-point gap between the two loudest voices.

20Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependent
vs
93Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 14375 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

73 pts apart
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: California Proposition 65 · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · ECHA SVHC Candidate List

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Labor

    • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

    Packaging

    • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

    Coverage & match quality

    7 ratings · 3 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    1.0×
    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    What we know about the packaging

    Unidentified·0 of 1 identified

    Nobody recorded what this pack is actually made of beyond “plastic”, so the packaging score is a stand-in for the middle of that range — not a reading of this container.

    • Recorded only as “plastic” — no resin code. It could be PET (#1) (widely recyclable) or PVC (#3) (hard to recycle); nothing on record says which, so it counts as 46 out of 100, the middle of that range.

    This says how precisely the packaging is described, not how good it is — a fully identified material can still be a bad one.

    How we know the packaging

    Nobody published the material for this product, so it was read from the product photo — the container looks like this, rather than the maker saying so. Treat the packaging score as weaker here than on a product with a declared material.

    A photo also cannot show the resin code moulded into the base, so every plastic container reads as “plastic, unspecified” — the cautious end of the plastics range, not a finding about this particular pack.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·36 of 36 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on all 36 listed ingredients.

    Worth a look (9)

    • titanium dioxide8/10uv filter · uv absorber · colorantraters disagree

      ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

    • phenoxyethanol4/10preservative · antimicrobialraters disagree

      Mild sensitizer for some · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    • may contain: blue 1 lake4/10raters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • red 64/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • red 7 lake4/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • red 27 lake4/10raters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • red 28 lake4/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • red 40 lake4/10raters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • yellow 5 lake4/10cosmetic colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    ✓No flags in our sources (27)

    • phenylpropyldimethylsiloxysilicate
    • caprylyl methicone
    • phenyl trimethicone
    • paraffin
    • dimethicone/vinyl dimethicone crosspolymer
    • caprylic/capric triglyceride
    • vp/hexadecene copolymer
    • ceresin
    • hydrated silica
    • copernicia cerifera wax
    • synthetic beeswax
    • hydrogenated soybean oil
    • cetyl peg/ppg-10/1 dimethicone
    • lauryl laurate
    • stearic acid
    • caprylyl glycol
    • microcrystalline wax
    • silica
    • tocopherol
    • potassium sorbate
    • water
    • hexylene glycol
    • carmine
    • iron oxides
    • mica
    • yellow 6 lake
    • yellow 10 lake

    Where this came from

    Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfree.peta.org ↗

    Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.