Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Jade & Fox Co./Scrub, Forbidden Fruit (2020 formulation)
Scrub, Forbidden Fruit (2020 formulation)
Jade & Fox Co.

Scrub, Forbidden Fruit (2020 formulation)

uncategorized

Your composite

—OUT OF 100No data
—
Safety
—
Eco
—
Labor
—
Pkg
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Alternatives

Nothing beats this on safety.

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: ECHA SVHC Candidate List · California Proposition 65 · ANSES Endocrine Disruptors · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · IARC Monographs · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist

    Environmental

      ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

      Weighted by what you care about

      Tune your weights

      composite recomputes live

      +
      Ingredient safetyno rating

      No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

      Environmentalno rating

      No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

      Laborno rating

      No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

      Packagingno rating

      No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

      0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

      Ingredients, decoded

      Data availability

      Not enough to score·10 of 17 characterized

      Our sources have reference data on 10 of 17 listed ingredients; 7 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill. That is not enough of the label for a safety score to be honest, so we do not publish one.

      ✓No flags in our sources (10)

      • Pumice
      • Water
      • Sodium Cocoyl Isethionate
      • Sorbitol
      • Propylene Glycolcommon irritant
      • Green Tea Extract
      • Stearic Acid
      • Sodium Chloride
      • Diazolidinyl Ureacommon irritant
      • Mica

      No data in our sources (7)

      • Aloe Barbadensis * Aspalathus Linearis Glycerin
      • Jojoba Seed
      • Disodium
      • Raspberry powder
      • l
      • Lauryl Sulfosuccinate
      • Iodopropynyl Butylcarbamat

      Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

      What these ingredient tags mean (1)

      These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

      • common irritantPropylene Glycol, Diazolidinyl Urea

        • Propylene Glycol: A solvent that shows up in patch-test clinics, more often as irritation than as allergy. American Contact Dermatitis Society, Allergen of the Year 2018 (Jacob SE, Scheman A, McGowan MA, Dermatitis 2018;29(1):3-5).
        • Diazolidinyl Urea: A preservative the FDA lists as a formaldehyde releaser, so formaldehyde-reactive skin can notice it. How much reaches the skin depends on the whole formula, not on this name alone. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009, Annex V entry 46, permits diazolidinyl urea as a preservative up to 0,5%. The FDA names it among the "formaldehyde and formaldehyde releasing ingredients" on its Allergens in Cosmetics page (content current 25 February 2022). Annex V preamble point 2, as amended by Commission Regulation (EU) 2022/1181, requires the warning "releases formaldehyde" on any product whose total released formaldehyde exceeds 0,001% (10 ppm). That Regulation states the sensitisation ground itself, so the chain is drawn by the regulator and not by us: recital (2) names the class, "Certain of those preservatives are gradually releasing formaldehyde in order to fulfil a preserving function in the final cosmetic product (so called formaldehyde releasers)", and recital (3) gives the purpose of the warning, "In order to inform consumers sensitised to formaldehyde about the presence of formaldehyde that may trigger an allergic reaction". Recital (1) records that formaldehyde is classified a skin sensitizer (Category 1) in Part 3 of Annex VI to Regulation (EC) 1272/2008.