Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Tish & Snooky's/Manic Panic n.y.c. Semi Permanent Hair Color Cream, Dark Star
T&
Tish & Snooky's

Manic Panic n.y.c. Semi Permanent Hair Color Cream, Dark Star

Hair Color And Bleaching
NB

Cleaner pick · Safest color we have rated

Naturally Brite

Henna Hair Dye, Dark Brown

+76 on ingredient safety

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 1533 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

24OUT OF 100Horrible

Ingredient safety only

range 0–90

24▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
—
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

60-point split

0

Scan

60

Precautionary

0

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

1533 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 90-point gap between the two loudest voices.

0Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependent
vs
90EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)Government
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 1533 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

90 pts apart

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ANSES Endocrine Disruptors · ECHA SVHC Candidate List

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Coverage & match quality

    6 ratings · 1 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Laborno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·18 of 19 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 18 of 19 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Worth a look (8)

    • D&C GREEN 68/10raters disagree

      EU-prohibited · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • D&C RED 178/10raters disagree

      EU-prohibited · flagged by 3 of 9 lists

    • D&C VIOLET 28/10raters disagree

      EU-prohibited · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • METHYLISOTHIAZOLINONE7/10common irritantpreservativeraters disagree

      Strong contact sensitizer · flagged by 3 of 9 lists

    • METHYLCHLOROISOTHIAZOLINONE6/10common irritantpreservativeraters disagree

      Strong contact sensitizer · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • STEARALKONIUM CHLORIDE4/10preservative · antistatic · surfactant - cleansingraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • ALOE LEAF JUICE4/10raters disagree

      IARC possible carcinogen (Group 2B) · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    • BASIC VIOLET 24/10hair dyeingraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    ✓No flags in our sources (10)

    • WATER / AQUA / EAU
    • PROPYLENE GLYCOLcommon irritant
    • CETEARYL ALCOHOL
    • CETYL ALCOHOL
    • CETEARETH-20
    • OLEYL ALCOHOL
    • GUAR HYDROXYPROPYLTRIMONIUM CHLORIDE
    • ACETIC ACID
    • BASIC BLUE 99
    • BASIC BROWN 16

    No data in our sources (1)

    • EXT

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

    What these ingredient tags mean (1)

    These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

    • common irritantPROPYLENE GLYCOL, METHYLCHLOROISOTHIAZOLINONE, METHYLISOTHIAZOLINONE

      • PROPYLENE GLYCOL: A solvent that shows up in patch-test clinics, more often as irritation than as allergy. American Contact Dermatitis Society, Allergen of the Year 2018 (Jacob SE, Scheman A, McGowan MA, Dermatitis 2018;29(1):3-5).
      • METHYLCHLOROISOTHIAZOLINONE: A preservative restricted to rinse-off products in the EU because of contact-allergy reports. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009, Annex V entry 39 (rinse-off only, 0,0015% of a 3:1 mixture with methylisothiazolinone). The reason is in Commission Regulation (EU) No 1003/2014, recital 3, quoted rather than summarised: "The SCCS concluded that the mixture of Methylchloroisothiazolinone (and) Methylisothiazolinone in a ratio of 3:1 does not pose a risk to the health of the consumer when used as a preservative up to a maximum authorised concentration of 0,0015 % in rinse-off cosmetic products, apart from its skin sensitising potential. The SCCS indicated that induction and elicitation would be less likely in a rinse-off product than when the same concentration is present in a leave-on product." SCCS/1238/09 concludes it "is well recognised as an important skin sensitiser at current conditions of use".
      • METHYLISOTHIAZOLINONE: A preservative that patch-test clinics see reactions to often enough that the EU banned it from leave-on products. American Contact Dermatitis Society, Allergen of the Year 2013 (Castanedo-Tardana MP, Zug KA, Dermatitis 2013;24(1):2-6); SCCS Opinion on Methylisothiazolinone (P94), Submission II, SENSITISATION ONLY (SCCS/1521/13, revision of 27 March 2014); banned in leave-on cosmetics by Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/1198, which recites the need to address "the increased incidence of allergies induced by methylisothiazolinone".