Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Cai/12 Color Eyeshadow Palette Matte, Glitter & Shimmer Shades (2020 formulation)
12 Color Eyeshadow Palette Matte, Glitter & Shimmer Shades (2020 formulation)
Cai

12 Color Eyeshadow Palette Matte, Glitter & Shimmer Shades (2020 formulation)

Eye Shadow
Revolution Just Chillin' Cooling Shadow Stick

Cleaner pick · Safest eyes we have rated

Revolution

Revolution Just Chillin' Cooling Shadow Stick

+5 on ingredient safety

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 1387 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. We may earn a commission on the link; it never changes the order.

Your composite

70OUT OF 100Good

range 68–73

95
Safety
—
Eco
—
Labor
46
Pkg

Why this score

10-point split

90

Scan

100

Precautionary

94

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

1387 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

All 1387 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

raters agree
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: California Proposition 65 · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · IARC Monographs · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · ANSES Endocrine Disruptors

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Packaging

    • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

    Coverage & match quality

    4 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Laborno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    What we know about the packaging

    Unidentified·0 of 1 identified

    Nobody recorded what this pack is actually made of beyond “plastic”, so the packaging score is a stand-in for the middle of that range — not a reading of this container.

    • Recorded only as “plastic” — no resin code. It could be PET (#1) (widely recyclable) or PVC (#3) (hard to recycle); nothing on record says which, so it counts as 46 out of 100, the middle of that range.

    This says how precisely the packaging is described, not how good it is — a fully identified material can still be a bad one.

    How we know the packaging

    Nobody published the material for this product, so it was read from the product photo — the container looks like this, rather than the maker saying so. Treat the packaging score as weaker here than on a product with a declared material.

    A photo also cannot show the resin code moulded into the base, so every plastic container reads as “plastic, unspecified” — the cautious end of the plastics range, not a finding about this particular pack.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·14 of 16 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 14 of 16 listed ingredients; 2 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Worth a look (1)

    • CI 160354/10colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    ✓No flags in our sources (13)

    • MICA
    • KAOLIN
    • MAGNESIUM STEARATE
    • BISMUTH OXYCHLORIDE
    • DIMETHICONE
    • ETHYLHEXYL PALMITATE
    • TRIDECYL TRIMELLITATE
    • CI 77491
    • CI 77492
    • CI 77510
    • CI 77007
    • CI 77288
    • CI 77499

    No data in our sources (2)

    • PHENOXYETHANOL MAY CONTAIN: CI 77891
    • CI 19140:1

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.