Greenlens

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account
Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Elixir Naturals/Ultimate Nourishing Leave-In Hair Oil with Ylang Ylang & Jasmine
Ultimate Nourishing Leave-In Hair Oil with Ylang Ylang & Jasmine
Elixir Naturals

Ultimate Nourishing Leave-In Hair Oil with Ylang Ylang & Jasmine

Hair Treatment Serum
Bio Therapy Conditioner

Cleaner pick · Safest treatment we have rated

Africology Skincare & Spa

Bio Therapy Conditioner

+15 on ingredient safety

250ml · 47.50 ZAR · 19 ZAR/100 ml

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 375 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

85OUT OF 100Excellent

Ingredient safety only

range 80–100

85▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
—
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

9-point split

91

Scan

98

Precautionary

100

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

375 found

See better →

Flagged

6 ingredients

What's flagged →

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 20-point gap between the two loudest voices.

80ANSES Endocrine DisruptorsGovernment
vs
100Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 375 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

20 pts apart
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Coverage & match quality

    5 ratings · 1 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Laborno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·22 of 22 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on all 22 listed ingredients.

    Worth a look (6)

    • thymol6/10fragrance · hair dyeing · denaturantraters disagree

      ANSES endocrine candidate · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    • aloe barbadensis leaf extract4/10humectant · emollient · oral careraters disagree

      IARC possible carcinogen (Group 2B) · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    • jasminum officinale flower extract4/10perfuming · fragranceraters disagree

      EU-regulated fragrance allergen · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    • jasminum officinale oil4/10perfuming · fragrance · moisturisingraters disagree

      EU-regulated fragrance allergen · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    • cananga odorata flower oil4/10fragrance materialperfuming · fragranceraters disagree

      EU-regulated fragrance allergen · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    • melaleuca alternifolia leaf oil4/10common irritantfragrance materialperfuming · antioxidantraters disagree

      Mild sensitizer for some · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    ✓No flags in our sources (16)

    • caprylic/capric triglyceride
    • simmondsia chinensis seed oil
    • argania spinosa kernel oil
    • cocos nucifera oil
    • ricinus communis seed oil
    • gardenia taitensis flower extract
    • adansonia digitata seed oil
    • carthamus tinctorius seed oilfragrance material
    • triticum vulgare germ oil
    • camellia sinensis seed oil
    • emblica officinalis fruit extract
    • simmondsia chinensis seed extract
    • linum usitatissimum seed oilfragrance material
    • brassica campestris seed oil
    • tocopheryl acetate
    • rosmarinus officinalis leaf oilfragrance material
    What these ingredient tags mean (1)

    These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

    • common irritantmelaleuca alternifolia leaf oil

      • melaleuca alternifolia leaf oil: An essential oil whose oxidation products carry its sensitising potential; the EU assesses it as a moderate skin sensitiser. SCCS Scientific Opinion on Tea Tree Oil (CAS/EC 68647-73-4 / 285-377-1), SCCS/1681/25, adopted 30 October 2025, which concludes it is a moderate skin sensitiser. It does not set maximum levels of its own: it assesses the concentrations the applicant defended, and finds no concern at 2,0% in shampoo, 1,0% in shower gel, 1,0% in face wash and 0,1% in face cream, for oil conforming to ISO 4730:2017, in adults, in non-sprayable formats. It draws on the earlier SCCP opinions SCCP/1155/08 and SCCP/0843/04 and incorporates their data by reference; it says nothing about their status.