Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Wet n Wild/Fergie Centerstage Collection Photo Focus Eyeshadow (2019 formulation)
Fergie Centerstage Collection Photo Focus Eyeshadow (2019 formulation)
Wet n Wild

Fergie Centerstage Collection Photo Focus Eyeshadow (2019 formulation)

Eye Shadow
Just Chillin' Cooling Shadow Stick

Cleaner pick · Safest eyes we have rated

Revolution

Just Chillin' Cooling Shadow Stick

+43 on ingredient safety

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 10160 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

73OUT OF 100Good

range 70–84

57▲▼ split
Safety
78
Eco
85
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

16-point split

60

Scan

60

Precautionary

76

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

10160 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 43-point gap between the two loudest voices.

47IARC MonographsGovernment
vs
90EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)Government
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 10160 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

43 pts apart
  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ECHA SVHC Candidate List

Environmental

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

Labor

  • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates Wet n Wild as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →

Coverage & match quality

9 ratings · 3 of 4 axes

  • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
  • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

Weighted by what you care about

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

+
1.0×
1.0×
1.0×
Packagingno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

Ingredients, decoded

Data availability

Robust·43 of 44 characterized

Our sources have reference data on 43 of 44 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

Worth a look (6)

  • TITANIUM DIOXIDE/CI 778918/10raters disagree

    ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

  • METHYLISOTHIAZOLINONE7/10common irritantpreservativeraters disagree

    Strong contact sensitizer · flagged by 3 of 9 lists

  • TALC6/10abrasive · absorbent · anticakingraters disagree

    IARC probable carcinogen (Group 2A) · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

  • NYLON-124/10opacifying · bulking · viscosity controllingraters disagree

    EU microplastics-restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • POLYACRYLAMIDE4/10film forming · antistatic · bindingraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • BLUE 1 LAKE/CI 420904/10cosmetic colorant · hair dyeing · colorantraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

✓No flags in our sources (37)

  • DIMETHICONErich occlusive
  • ETHYL MACADAMIATE
  • BORON NITRIDE
  • OCTYLDODECYL STEAROYL STEARATE
  • MAGNESIUM STEARATE
  • SYNTHETIC FLUORPHLOGOPITE
  • CAPRYLIC/CAPRIC TRIGLYCERIDE
  • DIMETHICONE/VINYL DIMETHICONE CROSSPOLYMER
  • CALCIUM SODIUM BOROSILICATE
  • C10-30 CHOLESTEROL/LANOSTEROL ESTERS
  • POLYSORBATE 20
  • CALCIUM TITANIUM BOROSILICATE
  • POLYBUTENE
  • TRIMETHYLSILOXYSILICATE
  • CAPRYLYL GLYCOL
  • CALCIUM ALUMINUM BOROSILICATE
  • SORBITAN STEARATE
  • CHLORPHENESIN
  • MAGNESIUM ALUMINUM SILICATE
  • ETHYLHEXYL PALMITATE
  • CAPRYLHYDROXAMIC ACID
  • GLYCERINhumectant
  • TOCOPHEROL
  • TOCOPHERYL ACETATE
  • OCTYLDODECANOL
  • SILICA
  • C13-14 ISOPARAFFIN
  • LAURETH-7
  • CARMINE/CI 75470
  • CHROMIUM OXIDE GREENS/CI 77288
  • FERRIC FERROCYANIDE/CI 77510
  • IRON OXIDES/CI 77491
  • CI 77492
  • CI 77499
  • MANGANESE VIOLET/CI 77742
  • MICA
  • ULTRAMARINES/CI 77007

No data in our sources (1)

  • BLACK 2/CI 77266

Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

What these ingredient tags mean (3)

These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

  • common irritantMETHYLISOTHIAZOLINONE

    • METHYLISOTHIAZOLINONE: A preservative that patch-test clinics see reactions to often enough that the EU banned it from leave-on products. American Contact Dermatitis Society, Allergen of the Year 2013 (Castanedo-Tardana MP, Zug KA, Dermatitis 2013;24(1):2-6); SCCS Opinion on Methylisothiazolinone (P94), Submission II, SENSITISATION ONLY (SCCS/1521/13, revision of 27 March 2014); banned in leave-on cosmetics by Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/1198, which recites the need to address "the increased incidence of allergies induced by methylisothiazolinone".
  • rich occlusiveDIMETHICONE

    • DIMETHICONE: A silicone that forms a film on the surface of the skin without an oily feel. FDA OTC skin protectant monograph, 21 CFR 347.10(g), lists dimethicone as a skin protectant at 1 to 30%.
  • humectantGLYCERIN

    • GLYCERIN: A humectant, and one of the two ingredients a comparison of moisturiser components found made a significant difference to skin hydration. FDA OTC skin protectant monograph, 21 CFR 347.10(h), lists glycerin as a skin protectant at 20 to 45%. On the humectant half: Jeong CB, Han JY, Cho JC, Suh KD, Nam GW, "Analysis of electrical property changes of skin by oil-in-water emulsion components", Int J Cosmet Sci 2013;35(4):402-410, DOI 10.1111/ics.12059, PMID 23621673, found that "glycerine and urea showed significant skin hydration effects compared with other humectants".