Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Profusion/Cosmetics Glitter Greetings 4 Shade Glitter Palette, Jingle
Profusion

Cosmetics Glitter Greetings 4 Shade Glitter Palette, Jingle

Eye Shadowtypically under $12

Profusion

Cosmetics Glitter Greetings 4 Shade Glitter Palette, Jingle

Eye Shadow

hover a pillar to set the scene →

Your composite

81OUT OF 100Good

range 78–83

—
Pkg

Why this score

8-point split

90

Scan

98

Precautionary

94

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

341 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Cleaner options

See 341 cleaner alternatives

Same category, all safer. We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

See better →

1 is in this product's price band or under →

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

raters agree
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: California Proposition 65 · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · ANSES Endocrine Disruptors

Environmental

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

Labor

  • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

Coverage & match quality

6 ratings · 3 of 4 axes

  • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
  • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

Weighted by what you care about

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

+
1.0×
1.0×
1.0×
Packagingno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

Ingredients, decoded

Data availability

Good·9 of 12 characterized

Our sources have reference data on 9 of 12 listed ingredients; 3 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

Worth a look (5)

  • POLYETHYLENE TEREPHTHALATE4/10film formingraters disagree

    EU microplastics-restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • ACRYLATES COPOLYMER4/10film forming · antistatic · bindingraters disagree

    EU microplastics-restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • PHENOXYETHANOL4/10preservative · antimicrobialraters disagree

    Mild sensitizer for some · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • MAY CONTAIN: FD&C YELLOW 54/10raters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • D&C BLACK NO.24/10raters disagree

    IARC possible carcinogen (Group 2B) · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

✓No flags in our sources (4)

  • MINERAL OIL
  • POLYISOBUTENE
  • HYDROGENATED STYRENE/ ISOPRENE COPOLYMER
  • FERRIC AMMONIUM FERROCYANIDE

No data in our sources (3)

  • ALUMINUM
  • D&C RED NO.7 CA LAKE
  • FD&C RED NO.40 AL LAKE

Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

Where this came from

Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfree.peta.org ↗

Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.