Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/e.l.f./Glossy Lip Stain - Fiery Red
Glossy Lip Stain - Fiery Red
e.l.f.

Glossy Lip Stain - Fiery Red

Lip Gloss

Cleaner pick · Safest lips we have rated

VMV Hypoallergenics

Velvet Matte Lipstick

+29 on ingredient safety

$14

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 2765 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

81OUT OF 100Good

range 74–95

71▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
90
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

38-point split

60

Scan

98

Precautionary

76

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

2765 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 38-point gap between the two loudest voices.

60Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependent
vs
98Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 2765 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

38 pts apart
  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: California Proposition 65 · IARC Monographs · ANSES Endocrine Disruptors · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Labor

    raters agree
    • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates e.l.f. as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →

    • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

    Coverage & match quality

    6 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·26 of 26 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on all 26 listed ingredients.

    Worth a look (6)

    • Hydroxyethyl Acrylate6/10film formingraters disagree

      EU harmonised skin sensitizer · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    • Phenoxyethanol4/10preservative · antimicrobialraters disagree

      Mild sensitizer for some · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    • Yellow 54/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • Red 334/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • Red 284/10cosmetic colorant · pigmentraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • Red 33 Lake4/10raters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    ✓No flags in our sources (20)

    • Bis-Diglyceryl Polyacyladipate-2
    • Water
    • Diisostearyl Malate
    • Diphenylsiloxy Phenyl Trimethicone
    • Pentylene Glycol
    • Glycerinhumectant
    • Octyldodecanol
    • Polysorbate 60
    • Polybutene
    • Dipropylene Glycol
    • Sodium Acryloyldimethyl Taurate Copolymer
    • Ceteareth-20
    • Squalane
    • Sorbitan Stearate
    • Cetyl PEG/PPG10/1 Dimethicone
    • Pentaerythrityl Tetradi-T-Butyl Hydroxyhydrocinnamate
    • Sorbitan Isostearate
    • Ethylhexylglycerin
    • Mangifera Indica Seed Butter
    • Yellow 6 Lake
    What these ingredient tags mean (1)

    These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

    • humectantGlycerin

      • Glycerin: A humectant, and one of the two ingredients a comparison of moisturiser components found made a significant difference to skin hydration. FDA OTC skin protectant monograph, 21 CFR 347.10(h), lists glycerin as a skin protectant at 20 to 45%. On the humectant half: Jeong CB, Han JY, Cho JC, Suh KD, Nam GW, "Analysis of electrical property changes of skin by oil-in-water emulsion components", Int J Cosmet Sci 2013;35(4):402-410, DOI 10.1111/ics.12059, PMID 23621673, found that "glycerine and urea showed significant skin hydration effects compared with other humectants".