Dr. Squatch
Men's Natural Odor Squatching Deodorant, Wood Barrel Bourbon
Deodoranttypically $12–30
Cleaner pick · Safest deodorant we have rated
Primally Pure
Geranium Deodorant+45 on ingredient safety
$16
Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Cleaner pick · Safest deodorant we have rated
Primally Pure
Geranium Deodorant+45 on ingredient safety
$16
Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.
Cleaner options
1542 found
Raters split
Ingredient safety
A 58-point gap between the two loudest voices.
All 1542 cleaner options, safest first We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Also screened, nothing found: California Proposition 65 · IARC Monographs · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · ANSES Endocrine Disruptors · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist
Recognized on a safer-ingredients list: US EPA Safer Choice recognizes 56% of ingredients as safer choices — a marker, never a score.
Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction
Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates Dr. Squatch as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →
Coverage & match quality
4 ratings · 2 of 4 axes
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
Data availability
Robust15 of 16 characterized
Our sources have reference data on 15 of 16 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.
Worth a look (1)
Undisclosed fragrance blendflagged by 2 of 9 lists →
No flags in our sources (14)
Where this came from
Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfree.peta.org ↗
Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.
No data in our sources (1)
Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.