Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyOpen data via Open Beauty Facts · no EWG/Yuka scraping
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Soft & Dri/Deodorant, Sparkling Citrus (2019 formulation)
Deodorant, Sparkling Citrus (2019 formulation)
Soft & Dri

Deodorant, Sparkling Citrus (2019 formulation)

Deodorant

Soft & Dri

Deodorant, Sparkling Citrus (2019 formulation)

Deodorant

hover a pillar to set the scene →

Your composite

46OUT OF 100Poor

Packaging only

—
Safety
—
Eco
—
Labor
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Alternatives

Nothing beats this on safety.

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: IARC Monographs · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · ANSES Endocrine Disruptors · California Proposition 65 · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist

    ✓US EPA Safer Choice (SCIL) recognizes 57% of ingredients as safer choices — a marker, never a score.

    Environmental

      ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

      Packaging

      • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

      Coverage & match quality

      1 rating · 1 of 4 axes

      • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
      • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

      Weighted by what you care about

      Tune your weights

      composite recomputes live

      +
      Ingredient safetyno rating

      No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

      Environmentalno rating

      No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

      Laborno rating

      No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

      1.0×
      0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

      What we know about the packaging

      Unidentified·0 of 1 identified

      Nobody recorded what this pack is actually made of beyond “plastic”, so the packaging score is a stand-in for the middle of that range — not a reading of this container.

      • Recorded only as “plastic” — no resin code. It could be PET (#1) (widely recyclable) or PVC (#3) (hard to recycle); nothing on record says which, so it counts as 46 out of 100, the middle of that range.

      This says how precisely the packaging is described, not how good it is — a fully identified material can still be a bad one.

      How we know the packaging

      Nobody published the material for this product, so it was read from the product photo — the container looks like this, rather than the maker saying so. Treat the packaging score as weaker here than on a product with a declared material.

      A photo also cannot show the resin code moulded into the base, so every plastic container reads as “plastic, unspecified” — the cautious end of the plastics range, not a finding about this particular pack.

      Ingredients, decoded

      Data availability

      Robust·7 of 7 characterized

      Our sources have reference data on all 7 listed ingredients.

      ✓No flags in our sources (7)

      • DIPROPYLENE GLYCOL
      • PROPYLENE GLYCOL
      • WATER
      • SODIUM STEARATE
      • FRAGRANCE
      • ETHYLHEXYGLYCERIN
      • RED 33