Paul Mitchell
Pail Mitchell Tea Tree Styling Gel
Styling Gel Lotion
Cleaner pick · Safest styling we have rated
Catrice Cosmetics
Curl Freeze Lash Styling Gel+56 on ingredient safety
$7
Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.
Raters split
Ingredient safety
A 65-point gap between the two loudest voices.
25Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
vs90EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)Government
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredientAll 3336 cleaner options, safest first We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.
Every rater, every axis
Ingredient safety
65 pts apartA government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Also screened, nothing found: ECHA SVHC Candidate List · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens
Environmental
Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction
Labor
raters agreeRun by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates Paul Mitchell as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →
Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Coverage & match quality
8 ratings · 2 of 4 axes
- Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
- Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.
Weighted by what you care about
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+
1.0×
Environmentalno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
1.0×
Packagingno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.
Ingredients, decoded
Data availability
Good28 of 41 characterized
Our sources have reference data on 28 of 41 listed ingredients; 13 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.
Worth a look (10)
ANSES CMR-listedflagged by 3 of 9 lists
Carcinogen-linkedflagged by 1 of 9 lists
EU harmonised skin sensitizerflagged by 1 of 9 lists
Undisclosed fragrance blendflagged by 2 of 9 lists
Undisclosed fragrance blendflagged by 2 of 9 lists
Mild sensitizer for someflagged by 1 of 9 lists
IARC possible carcinogen (Group 2B)flagged by 1 of 9 lists
IARC possible carcinogen (Group 2B)flagged by 1 of 9 lists
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists
No flags in our sources (18)
No data in our sources (13)
- VP
- VA Copolymer
- Melaleuca Alternifolia
- Leaf Oil
- Hedychium Coronarium
- White Ginger
- Flower
- Leaf
- Stem Extract
- Leaf Extract
- Bisamino PEG
- PPG-41
- 3 Aminoethyl PG-Propyl Dimethicone
Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.
Where this came from
Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfree.peta.org ↗
Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.