Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyOpen data via Open Beauty Facts · no EWG/Yuka scraping
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Axe/Daily Fragrance, Gold Temptation (2019 formulation)
Daily Fragrance, Gold Temptation (2019 formulation)
Axe

Daily Fragrance, Gold Temptation (2019 formulation)

Body Spray

Axe

Daily Fragrance, Gold Temptation (2019 formulation)

Body Spray

hover a pillar to set the scene →

Your composite

23OUT OF 100Horrible

range 15–55

—
Eco
—
Pkg

Why this score

42-point split

0

Scan

42

Precautionary

0

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

784 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 80-point gap between the two loudest voices.

0Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependent
vs
80ANSES Endocrine DisruptorsGovernment
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

Cleaner options

See 784 cleaner alternatives

Same category, all safer. We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

See better →

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

80 pts apart
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · IARC Monographs · ECHA SVHC Candidate List

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Labor

    • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

    Coverage & match quality

    6 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·6 of 6 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on all 6 listed ingredients.

    Worth a look (4)

    • BUTANE9/10propellantraters disagree

      EU-prohibited · flagged by 3 of 9 lists

    • ISOBUTANE9/10propellantraters disagree

      EU-prohibited · flagged by 3 of 9 lists

    • ALCOHOL DENAT6/10fragrance · antimicrobial · antifoamingraters disagree

      ANSES endocrine candidate · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    • FRAGRANCE6/10perfumingraters disagree

      Undisclosed fragrance blend · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    ✓No flags in our sources (2)

    • HYDROFLUOROCARBON 152A
    • PROPANE