Azure
Hyaluronic & Retinol Anti-Aging Facial Serum
Anti-Aging
hover a pillar to set the scene →
Raters split
Ingredient safety
A 33-point gap between the two loudest voices.
65California Proposition 65Government
vs98Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredientCleaner options
See 211 cleaner alternatives
Same category, all safer. We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.
Every rater, every axis
Ingredient safety
33 pts apartA government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Also screened, nothing found: ECHA SVHC Candidate List · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · ANSES Endocrine Disruptors
Environmental
Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction
Coverage & match quality
6 ratings · 1 of 4 axes
- Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
- Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.
Weighted by what you care about
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+
1.0×
Environmentalno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
Laborno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
Packagingno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.
Ingredients, decoded
Data availability
Robust14 of 15 characterized
Our sources have reference data on 14 of 15 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.
Worth a look (3)
Prop 65-listedflagged by 4 of 9 lists
IARC possible carcinogen (Group 2B)flagged by 1 of 9 lists
Mild sensitizer for someflagged by 1 of 9 lists
No flags in our sources (11)
No data in our sources (1)
Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.