Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyOpen data via Open Beauty Facts · no EWG/Yuka scraping
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Colourpop/Super Shock Shadow, Runyon
Super Shock Shadow, Runyon
Colourpop

Super Shock Shadow, Runyon

Eye Shadow

Colourpop

Super Shock Shadow, Runyon

Eye Shadow

hover a pillar to set the scene →

Your composite

64OUT OF 100Fair

Ingredient safety only

range 60–82

—
Eco
—
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

17-point split

70

Scan

65

Precautionary

82

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

2024 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 22-point gap between the two loudest voices.

60ECHA SVHC Candidate ListGovernment
vs
82Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

Cleaner options

See 2024 cleaner alternatives

Same category, all safer. We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

See better →

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

22 pts apart

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · California Proposition 65 · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · US NTP Report on Carcinogens

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Coverage & match quality

    6 ratings · 1 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Laborno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·37 of 41 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 37 of 41 listed ingredients; 4 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Worth a look (7)

    • titanium dioxide8/10uv filter · uv absorber · colorantraters disagree

      ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

    • cyclopentasiloxane4/10emollient · hair conditioning · skin conditioningraters disagree

      Persistent / bioaccumulative · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    • cyclohexasiloxane4/10emollient · hair conditioning · skin conditioningraters disagree

      Persistent / bioaccumulative · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    • phenoxyethanol4/10preservative · antimicrobialraters disagree

      Mild sensitizer for some · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    • black 24/10colorantraters disagree

      IARC possible carcinogen (Group 2B) · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    • blue 1 lake4/10cosmetic colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • yellow 5 lake4/10cosmetic colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    ✓No flags in our sources (30)

    • dimethicone
    • calcium sodium borosilicate
    • synthetic fluorphlogopite
    • calcium aluminum borosilicate
    • alumina
    • trimethylsiloxysilicate
    • aluminum calcium sodium silicate
    • isododecane
    • boron nitride
    • silica
    • c30-45 alkyl cetearyl dimethicone crosspolymer
    • dimethicone/vinyltrimethylsiloxysilicate crosspolymer
    • disteardimonium hectorite
    • tin oxide
    • glycine soja oil
    • mangifera indica seed butter
    • propylene carbonate
    • ethylhexylglycerin
    • cucumis sativus fruit extract
    • triethoxycaprylylsilane
    • hydrogenated polyisobutene
    • palmitic acid
    • may contain: aluminum powder
    • bismuth oxychloride
    • chromium oxide greens
    • ferric ferrocyanide
    • iron oxides
    • manganese violet
    • mica
    • ultramarines

    No data in our sources (4)

    • bronze powder
    • chromium hydroxide green
    • copper powder
    • red 40 lake

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.