Greenlens

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account
Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/e.l.f./Stardust Glitter Bronze Comet (2018 formulation)
Stardust Glitter Bronze Comet (2018 formulation)
e.l.f.

Stardust Glitter Bronze Comet (2018 formulation)

Glitter
Grave Dust Glitter, Ethereal

Cleaner pick · Safest glitter we have rated

Holograve Cosmetics

Grave Dust Glitter, Ethereal

+17 on ingredient safety

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 34 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

83OUT OF 100Good

range 83–84

82
Safety
78
Eco
90
Labor
—
Pkg
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

34 found

See better →

Flagged

2 ingredients

What's flagged →

All 34 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: ANSES Endocrine Disruptors · California Proposition 65 · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist

Environmental

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

Labor

raters agree
  • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates e.l.f. as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

Coverage & match quality

4 ratings · 3 of 4 axes

  • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
  • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

Weighted by what you care about

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

+
1.0×
1.0×
1.0×
Packagingno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

Ingredients, decoded

Data availability

Not enough to score·3 of 6 characterized

Our sources have reference data on 3 of 6 listed ingredients; 3 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill. That is not enough of the label for a safety score to be honest, so we do not publish one.

Worth a look (2)

  • POLYETHYLENE TEREPHTHALATE4/10film formingraters disagree

    EU microplastics-restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

  • DC BLACK 24/10raters disagree

    IARC possible carcinogen (Group 2B) · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

✓No flags in our sources (1)

  • RED IRON OXIDE

No data in our sources (3)

  • POLYSILICON-1
  • ALUMINUM MAY CONTAIN: TITANIUM DIOXIDE
  • MANGANESE VIOLET FERRIC AMMONIUM FERROCYANIDE

Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.